It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EPD’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileGBNXF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EPD’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GBNXF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
EPD (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а +0.64% price change this week, while GBNXF (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was -1.40% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was +4.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.51%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.22%.
EPD is expected to report earnings on Jan 30, 2025.
Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.
EPD | GBNXF | EPD / GBNXF | |
Capitalization | 63.7B | 2.2B | 2,901% |
EBITDA | 9.05B | 541M | 1,672% |
Gain YTD | 28.536 | 11.162 | 256% |
P/E Ratio | 11.65 | 10.88 | 107% |
Revenue | 49.7B | 10.7B | 464% |
Total Cash | 180M | 40.6M | 443% |
Total Debt | 29.1B | 1.65B | 1,769% |
EPD | GBNXF | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 88 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 13 Undervalued | 12 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 25 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 45 | 42 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | 54 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 41 | 38 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GBNXF's Valuation (12) in the null industry is in the same range as EPD (13) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry. This means that GBNXF’s stock grew similarly to EPD’s over the last 12 months.
EPD's Profit vs Risk Rating (25) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is significantly better than the same rating for GBNXF (100) in the null industry. This means that EPD’s stock grew significantly faster than GBNXF’s over the last 12 months.
GBNXF's SMR Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as EPD (45) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry. This means that GBNXF’s stock grew similarly to EPD’s over the last 12 months.
EPD's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as GBNXF (54) in the null industry. This means that EPD’s stock grew similarly to GBNXF’s over the last 12 months.
GBNXF's P/E Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as EPD (41) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry. This means that GBNXF’s stock grew similarly to EPD’s over the last 12 months.
EPD | GBNXF | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago52% | 3 days ago73% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago42% | 3 days ago48% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago41% | 3 days ago58% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago45% | 3 days ago60% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago50% | 3 days ago55% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago39% | 3 days ago54% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago49% | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago45% | 11 days ago54% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago44% | 3 days ago66% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago47% | 3 days ago44% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EPD has been closely correlated with ET. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EPD jumps, then ET could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GBNXF has been loosely correlated with EPD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GBNXF jumps, then EPD could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GBNXF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
GBNXF | 100% | N/A | ||
EPD - GBNXF | 44% Loosely correlated | +1.55% | ||
WMB - GBNXF | 42% Loosely correlated | +1.02% | ||
OKE - GBNXF | 42% Loosely correlated | +1.21% | ||
ET - GBNXF | 40% Loosely correlated | +2.94% | ||
KMI - GBNXF | 39% Loosely correlated | +1.04% | ||
More |