EPIPF
Price
$15.90
Change
-$1.40 (-8.09%)
Updated
Apr 9 closing price
Capitalization
22.9B
XOS
Price
$3.28
Change
+$0.04 (+1.23%)
Updated
Jul 3, 12:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
78.73M
Interact to see
Advertisement

EPIPF vs XOS

Header iconEPIPF vs XOS Comparison
Open Charts EPIPF vs XOSBanner chart's image
Epiroc Aktiebolag
Price$15.90
Change-$1.40 (-8.09%)
Volume$285
Capitalization22.9B
Xos
Price$3.28
Change+$0.04 (+1.23%)
Volume$244
Capitalization78.73M
EPIPF vs XOS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EPIPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
XOS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EPIPF vs. XOS commentary
Jul 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EPIPF is a Buy and XOS is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 03, 2025
Stock price -- (EPIPF: $15.90 vs. XOS: $3.24)
Brand notoriety: EPIPF and XOS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EPIPF: 100% vs. XOS: 72%
Market capitalization -- EPIPF: $22.9B vs. XOS: $78.73M
EPIPF [@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery] is valued at $22.9B. XOS’s [@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery] market capitalization is $78.73M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery] industry ranges from $181.64B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery] industry is $12.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EPIPF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileXOS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • EPIPF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • XOS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, EPIPF is a better buy in the long-term than XOS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EPIPF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while XOS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EPIPF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • XOS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, XOS is a better buy in the short-term than EPIPF.

Price Growth

EPIPF (@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while XOS (@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery) price change was +5.71% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery industry was +3.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.53%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.97%.

Reported Earning Dates

XOS is expected to report earnings on May 15, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery (+3.42% weekly)

The industry designs and builds agricultural, construction and other large commercial and transportation equipment. Tractors, planters and harvesters, as well as rock-crushing, railroad, demolition and other construction implements are produced by this industry. Rapid urbanization and industrialization has been bolstering the expansion of the construction sector in the past few decades, thereby boosting demand for heavy equipment businesses. Caterpillar Inc., Deere & Company and Cummins Inc (Ex. Cummins Engine Inc) are some prominent companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EPIPF($22.9B) has a higher market cap than XOS($78.7M). EPIPF has higher P/E ratio than XOS: EPIPF (22.47) vs XOS (11.03). EPIPF YTD gains are higher at: 5.648 vs. XOS (0.000). EPIPF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 15B vs. XOS (-73.55M). EPIPF has more cash in the bank: 6.56B vs. XOS (22.6M). XOS has less debt than EPIPF: XOS (37.4M) vs EPIPF (14.2B). EPIPF has higher revenues than XOS: EPIPF (56.5B) vs XOS (34.7M).
EPIPFXOSEPIPF / XOS
Capitalization22.9B78.7M29,098%
EBITDA15B-73.55M-20,396%
Gain YTD5.6480.000-
P/E Ratio22.4711.03204%
Revenue56.5B34.7M162,824%
Total Cash6.56B22.6M29,035%
Total Debt14.2B37.4M37,968%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EPIPF: Fundamental Ratings
EPIPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
44
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
55
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
69
SMR RATING
1..100
42
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
60
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
75
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EPIPFXOS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
18%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
11%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EPIPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
XOS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JXHGF4.91N/A
N/A
Eneos Holdings Inc.
DSBX15.20N/A
N/A
Dogwood State Bank RALEIGH NC
FMCCI17.95-0.05
-0.28%
Freddie Mac
GFGSF0.13N/A
-0.78%
GFG Resources Inc.
FHNGY7.39-0.33
-4.27%
Foschini Group Ltd. (The)

EPIPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EPIPF and KUBTF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EPIPF and KUBTF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EPIPF
1D Price
Change %
EPIPF100%
N/A
KUBTF - EPIPF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
XOS - EPIPF
13%
Poorly correlated
+4.18%
PTJSF - EPIPF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BEEP - EPIPF
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.89%
TRATF - EPIPF
1%
Poorly correlated
+4.97%
More

XOS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that XOS and ASTE have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that XOS and ASTE's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To XOS
1D Price
Change %
XOS100%
+4.18%
ASTE - XOS
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.44%
HY - XOS
25%
Poorly correlated
+2.20%
VAPE - XOS
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.29%
ACA - XOS
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.07%
LNN - XOS
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.30%
More