Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EPIVX vs HFQRX
EPIVX vs HFQRX Comparison
Open Charts EPIVX vs HFQRX
EuroPac International Value A
Price$13.91
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets175.03M
Janus Henderson Global Equity Income N
Price$6.96
Change-$0.05 (-0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.7B
EPIVX vs HFQRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EPIVX vs. HFQRX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EPIVX is a Hold and HFQRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HFQRX has more cash in the bank: 6.7B vs. EPIVX (175M). HFQRX pays higher dividends than EPIVX: HFQRX (7.24) vs EPIVX (1.26). EPIVX was incepted earlier than HFQRX: EPIVX (16 years) vs HFQRX (10 years). EPIVX (1.73) is less costly to investors than HFQRX (0.70). HFQRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 155.00 vs. EPIVX (20.00). EPIVX has a lower initial minimum investment than HFQRX: EPIVX (2500) vs HFQRX (1000000). EPIVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 31.22 vs. HFQRX (20.72). EPIVX return over 5 years is better than : 76.29 vs. HFQRX (59.64).
| EPIVX | HFQRX | EPIVX / HFQRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.73 | 0.70 | 247% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.73 | 0.70 | 247% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 36.490 | 22.066 | 165% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 175M | 6.7B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.26 | 7.24 | 17% |
| Returns for 1 year | 31.22 | 20.72 | 151% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.41 | 45.56 | 139% |
| Returns for 5 years | 76.29 | 59.64 | 128% |
| Returns for 10 years | 155.19 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement