Ad is loading...
EQAL vs SCHM
EQAL vs SCHM Comparison
Open Charts EQAL vs SCHM
Invesco Russell 1000 Equal Weight ETF
Price$45.80
Change+$0.06 (+0.13%)
Volume$300
Net Assets588.86M
Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF™
Price$25.66
Change+$0.16 (+0.63%)
Volume$100
Net Assets10.56B
EQAL vs SCHM Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EQAL vs. SCHM commentary
Apr 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EQAL is a StrongBuy and SCHM is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHM has more net assets: 10.6B vs. EQAL (589M). EQAL has a higher annual dividend yield than SCHM: EQAL (-4.872) vs SCHM (-7.711). EQAL was incepted earlier than SCHM: EQAL (10 years) vs SCHM (14 years). SCHM (0.04) has a lower expense ratio than EQAL (0.20). EQAL has a higher turnover SCHM (13.00) vs SCHM (13.00).
| EQAL | SCHM | EQAL / SCHM | |
| Gain YTD | -4.872 | -7.711 | 63% |
| Net Assets | 589M | 10.6B | 6% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.20 | 0.04 | 500% |
| Turnover | 30.00 | 13.00 | 231% |
| Yield | 1.74 | 1.48 | 117% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 14 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| EQAL | SCHM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 6 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 81% | 14 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
EQAL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EQAL has been loosely correlated with ROKU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EQAL jumps, then ROKU could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EQAL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EQAL | 100% | +0.35% | ||
| ROKU - EQAL | 50% Loosely correlated | +3.70% | ||
| FYBR - EQAL | 48% Loosely correlated | +0.06% | ||
| CMCSA - EQAL | 44% Loosely correlated | -0.38% | ||
| CSCO - EQAL | 43% Loosely correlated | +0.23% | ||
| MSI - EQAL | 33% Loosely correlated | +0.18% | ||
More | ||||
SCHM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHM has been loosely correlated with STLD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCHM jumps, then STLD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHM | 100% | +0.39% | ||
| STLD - SCHM | 55% Loosely correlated | +0.47% | ||
| PTC - SCHM | 54% Loosely correlated | -1.43% | ||
| DKNG - SCHM | 52% Loosely correlated | -1.51% | ||
| NTAP - SCHM | 42% Loosely correlated | -0.51% | ||
| WDC - SCHM | 41% Loosely correlated | +0.32% | ||
More | ||||