EQBBF
Price
$33.00
Change
+$0.04 (+0.12%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
28.31B
PIAC
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.02 (-28.57%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
31.33M
Interact to see
Advertisement

EQBBF vs PIAC

Header iconEQBBF vs PIAC Comparison
Open Charts EQBBF vs PIACBanner chart's image
EQT AB
Price$33.00
Change+$0.04 (+0.12%)
Volume$10K
Capitalization28.31B
Princeton Capital
Price$0.05
Change-$0.02 (-28.57%)
Volume$20.4K
Capitalization31.33M
EQBBF vs PIAC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EQBBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PIAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EQBBF vs. PIAC commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EQBBF is a Hold and PIAC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (EQBBF: $33.00 vs. PIAC: $0.05)
Brand notoriety: EQBBF and PIAC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EQBBF: 45% vs. PIAC: 122%
Market capitalization -- EQBBF: $28.31B vs. PIAC: $31.33M
EQBBF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $28.31B. PIAC’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $31.33M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EQBBF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePIAC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EQBBF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PIAC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, EQBBF is a better buy in the long-term than PIAC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EQBBF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PIAC’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EQBBF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • PIAC’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EQBBF is a better buy in the short-term than PIAC.

Price Growth

EQBBF (@Investment Managers) experienced а +1.13% price change this week, while PIAC (@Investment Managers) price change was -21.48% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.33%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+2.17% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EQBBF($28.3B) has a higher market cap than PIAC($31.3M). EQBBF has higher P/E ratio than PIAC: EQBBF (101.01) vs PIAC (4.64). EQBBF YTD gains are higher at: 11.600 vs. PIAC (-59.689). EQBBF has more cash in the bank: 496M vs. PIAC (311K). PIAC has less debt than EQBBF: PIAC (26.8K) vs EQBBF (2.12B). EQBBF has higher revenues than PIAC: EQBBF (1.77B) vs PIAC (8.58M).
EQBBFPIACEQBBF / PIAC
Capitalization28.3B31.3M90,415%
EBITDA468MN/A-
Gain YTD11.600-59.689-19%
P/E Ratio101.014.642,176%
Revenue1.77B8.58M20,625%
Total Cash496M311K159,486%
Total Debt2.12B26.8K7,895,522%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PIAC: Fundamental Ratings
PIAC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
1
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
95
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
95
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
58
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EQBBFPIAC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
35%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
40%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
50%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
44%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
29%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
43%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EQBBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PIAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WKHS1.450.11
+8.21%
Workhorse Group Inc
SID1.550.04
+2.65%
Companhia Siderurgica Nacional SA
SMR35.880.67
+1.90%
NuScale Power Corp
NLY19.490.17
+0.88%
Annaly Capital Management
BJDX1.630.01
+0.62%
Bluejay Diagnostics Inc

EQBBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EQBBF and PIAC have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EQBBF and PIAC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EQBBF
1D Price
Change %
EQBBF100%
N/A
PIAC - EQBBF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FFXDF - EQBBF
5%
Poorly correlated
+2.09%
ESIFF - EQBBF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CNDCF - EQBBF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DTSRF - EQBBF
1%
Poorly correlated
+1.20%
More

PIAC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PIAC and EQBBF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PIAC and EQBBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PIAC
1D Price
Change %
PIAC100%
N/A
EQBBF - PIAC
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ONEXF - PIAC
4%
Poorly correlated
+1.62%
QUILF - PIAC
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MNGPF - PIAC
-2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PGPHF - PIAC
-2%
Poorly correlated
+4.02%
More