EQFN
Price
$13.05
Change
+$0.25 (+1.95%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
33.75M
FMBH
Price
$37.57
Change
-$1.34 (-3.44%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
901.58M
68 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

EQFN vs FMBH

Header iconEQFN vs FMBH Comparison
Open Charts EQFN vs FMBHBanner chart's image
Equitable Financial
Price$13.05
Change+$0.25 (+1.95%)
Volume$1.25K
Capitalization33.75M
First Mid Bancshares
Price$37.57
Change-$1.34 (-3.44%)
Volume$184.87K
Capitalization901.58M
EQFN vs FMBH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EQFN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FMBH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EQFN vs. FMBH commentary
Aug 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EQFN is a StrongBuy and FMBH is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 16, 2025
Stock price -- (EQFN: $13.05 vs. FMBH: $37.57)
Brand notoriety: EQFN and FMBH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EQFN: 76% vs. FMBH: 265%
Market capitalization -- EQFN: $33.75M vs. FMBH: $901.58M
EQFN [@Regional Banks] is valued at $33.75M. FMBH’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $901.58M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $174.7B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.97B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EQFN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFMBH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EQFN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FMBH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, EQFN is a better buy in the long-term than FMBH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EQFN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FMBH’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EQFN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • FMBH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EQFN is a better buy in the short-term than FMBH.

Price Growth

EQFN (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.46% price change this week, while FMBH (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.43% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.72%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.87%.

Reported Earning Dates

FMBH is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.72% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FMBH($902M) has a higher market cap than EQFN($33.8M). EQFN (10.79) and FMBH (10.67) have similar P/E ratio . FMBH YTD gains are higher at: 4.017 vs. EQFN (2.353).
EQFNFMBHEQFN / FMBH
Capitalization33.8M902M4%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD2.3534.01759%
P/E Ratio10.7910.67101%
RevenueN/A331M-
Total CashN/A16.1M-
Total DebtN/A313M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EQFN vs FMBH: Fundamental Ratings
EQFN
FMBH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9755
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
55
Fair valued
98
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2752
SMR RATING
1..100
6526
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5853
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4469
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EQFN's Valuation (55) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FMBH (98). This means that EQFN’s stock grew somewhat faster than FMBH’s over the last 12 months.

EQFN's Profit vs Risk Rating (27) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FMBH (52). This means that EQFN’s stock grew similarly to FMBH’s over the last 12 months.

FMBH's SMR Rating (26) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EQFN (65). This means that FMBH’s stock grew somewhat faster than EQFN’s over the last 12 months.

FMBH's Price Growth Rating (53) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as EQFN (58). This means that FMBH’s stock grew similarly to EQFN’s over the last 12 months.

EQFN's P/E Growth Rating (44) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FMBH (69). This means that EQFN’s stock grew similarly to FMBH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EQFNFMBH
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
10%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
11%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
10%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
14%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
16%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
3%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
26%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
22%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EQFN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FMBH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JINTX34.50N/A
N/A
Johnson International
AVALX48.36N/A
N/A
Aegis Value I
CFJIX34.90N/A
N/A
Calvert US Large Cap Value Rspnb Idx I
HOOTX30.28N/A
N/A
Hartford Schroders US Small Cap Opps R5
SMVSX27.43N/A
N/A
Invesco Small Cap Value R6

EQFN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EQFN has been loosely correlated with SFGIF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EQFN jumps, then SFGIF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EQFN
1D Price
Change %
EQFN100%
+1.95%
SFGIF - EQFN
39%
Loosely correlated
N/A
FCPB - EQFN
23%
Poorly correlated
+3.29%
FNWB - EQFN
7%
Poorly correlated
+2.00%
BWFG - EQFN
2%
Poorly correlated
-1.56%
FMBH - EQFN
2%
Poorly correlated
-2.82%
More

FMBH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FMBH has been closely correlated with TCBK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FMBH jumps, then TCBK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FMBH
1D Price
Change %
FMBH100%
-2.82%
TCBK - FMBH
91%
Closely correlated
-1.78%
STBA - FMBH
90%
Closely correlated
-2.29%
TRMK - FMBH
90%
Closely correlated
-1.15%
UBSI - FMBH
89%
Closely correlated
-2.23%
IBCP - FMBH
89%
Closely correlated
-2.50%
More