EQH
Price
$40.71
Change
+$0.59 (+1.47%)
Updated
Sep 16, 03:14 PM (EDT)
44 days until earnings call
FIHL
Price
$17.78
Change
+$0.18 (+1.02%)
Updated
Sep 16, 03:17 PM (EDT)
63 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

EQH vs FIHL

Header iconEQH vs FIHL Comparison
Open Charts EQH vs FIHLBanner chart's image
Equitable Holdings
Price$40.71
Change+$0.59 (+1.47%)
Volume$724
CapitalizationN/A
Fidelis Insurance Holdings
Price$17.78
Change+$0.18 (+1.02%)
Volume$302
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
EQH vs FIHL Comparison Chart
Loading...
EQH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
FIHL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
EQH vs. FIHL commentary
Sep 16, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EQH is a StrongSell and FIHL is a StrongSell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 16, 2024
Stock price -- (EQH: $40.12 vs. FIHL: $17.60)
Brand notoriety: EQH and FIHL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Multi-Line Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EQH: 59% vs. FIHL: 59%
Market capitalization -- EQH: $12.53B vs. FIHL: $2.26B
EQH [@Multi-Line Insurance] is valued at $12.53B. FIHL’s [@Multi-Line Insurance] market capitalization is $2.26B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Multi-Line Insurance] industry ranges from $634.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Multi-Line Insurance] industry is $21.01B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EQH’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileFIHL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EQH’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • FIHL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, EQH is a better buy in the long-term than FIHL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EQH’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FIHL’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EQH’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FIHL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EQH is a better buy in the short-term than FIHL.

Price Growth

EQH (@Multi-Line Insurance) experienced а +1.36% price change this week, while FIHL (@Multi-Line Insurance) price change was -3.61% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Multi-Line Insurance industry was +0.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.61%.

Reported Earning Dates

EQH is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2024.

FIHL is expected to report earnings on Nov 18, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Multi-Line Insurance (+0.10% weekly)

A multi-line insurance contract bundles together exposures to risk and covers them under a single contract. For providers of such policies, the bundle is a potential risk diversification strategy since their exposure gets spread over several factors, which helps them mitigate a financial burden if a catastrophic event were to occur. Other potential benefits include getting more premiums from including more than one type of insurance in a bundle, and getting a competitive edge by procuring multiple insurance contracts with a customer. Examples of companies in this industry are Berkshire Hathaway (which owns several insurance companies), Chubb Limited, American International Group, Inc. and Sun Life Financial Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EQH($12.5B) has a higher market cap than FIHL($2.26B). EQH has higher P/E ratio than FIHL: EQH (10.76) vs FIHL (1.03). FIHL YTD gains are higher at: 40.555 vs. EQH (22.755). EQH has more cash in the bank: 75.3B vs. FIHL (4.01B). FIHL has less debt than EQH: FIHL (448M) vs EQH (5.63B). EQH has higher revenues than FIHL: EQH (10.5B) vs FIHL (3.59B).
EQHFIHLEQH / FIHL
Capitalization12.5B2.26B552%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD22.75540.55556%
P/E Ratio10.761.031,042%
Revenue10.5B3.59B292%
Total Cash75.3B4.01B1,880%
Total Debt5.63B448M1,257%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EQH: Fundamental Ratings
EQH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
88
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
92
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
19
SMR RATING
1..100
30
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
46
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
14
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EQHFIHL
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
47%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
EQH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
FIHL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TSCSX32.200.56
+1.77%
Thrivent Small Cap Stock S
LVAGX15.240.16
+1.06%
LSV Global Value Investor
PXGAX26.340.20
+0.77%
Impax US Sustainable Economy A
GHTMX13.320.03
+0.23%
Goldman Sachs International T/M Eq Instl
GSIQX22.690.01
+0.04%
Goldman Sachs GQG Ptnrs Intl Opps R

EQH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EQH has been closely correlated with AIG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EQH jumps, then AIG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EQH
1D Price
Change %
EQH100%
+2.06%
AIG - EQH
69%
Closely correlated
-0.10%
HIG - EQH
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.16%
AEG - EQH
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.01%
SLF - EQH
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.16%
ESGR - EQH
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.05%
More

FIHL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FIHL has been loosely correlated with SLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FIHL jumps, then SLF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FIHL
1D Price
Change %
FIHL100%
+1.32%
SLF - FIHL
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.16%
AIG - FIHL
33%
Loosely correlated
-0.10%
ORI - FIHL
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.48%
EQH - FIHL
25%
Poorly correlated
+2.06%
ACGL - FIHL
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.60%
More