EQH
Price
$47.65
Change
-$1.23 (-2.52%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
13.01B
One day until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
HIG
Price
$141.91
Change
-$1.14 (-0.80%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
38.9B
80 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

EQH vs HIG

EQH vs HIG Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EQH vs. HIG commentary
Aug 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EQH is a Hold and HIG is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 03, 2026
Stock price -- (EQH: $47.65 vs. HIG: $141.91)
Brand notoriety: EQH and HIG are both not notable
EQH represents the Investment Managers, while HIG is part of the Multi-Line Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EQH: 122% vs. HIG: 62%
Market capitalization -- EQH: $13.01B vs. HIG: $38.9B
EQH [@Investment Managers] is valued at $13.01B. HIG’s [@Multi-Line Insurance] market capitalization is $38.9B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $169.01B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Multi-Line Insurance] industry ranges from $634.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $9.2B. The average market capitalization across the [@Multi-Line Insurance] industry is $19.18B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EQH’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileHIG’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • EQH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • HIG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, HIG is a better buy in the long-term than EQH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EQH’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HIG’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EQH’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • HIG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HIG is a better buy in the short-term than EQH.

Price Growth

EQH (@Investment Managers) experienced а -0.73% price change this week, while HIG (@Multi-Line Insurance) price change was +0.98% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.92%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Multi-Line Insurance industry was +0.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.76%.

Reported Earning Dates

EQH is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.

HIG is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.71% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

@Multi-Line Insurance (+0.19% weekly)

A multi-line insurance contract bundles together exposures to risk and covers them under a single contract. For providers of such policies, the bundle is a potential risk diversification strategy since their exposure gets spread over several factors, which helps them mitigate a financial burden if a catastrophic event were to occur. Other potential benefits include getting more premiums from including more than one type of insurance in a bundle, and getting a competitive edge by procuring multiple insurance contracts with a customer. Examples of companies in this industry are Berkshire Hathaway (which owns several insurance companies), Chubb Limited, American International Group, Inc. and Sun Life Financial Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HIG($38.9B) has a higher market cap than EQH($13B). EQH has higher P/E ratio than HIG: EQH (37.88) vs HIG (9.80). HIG YTD gains are higher at: 3.914 vs. EQH (1.428). EQH has more cash in the bank: 41.1B vs. HIG (21B). HIG has less debt than EQH: HIG (4.37B) vs EQH (6.93B). HIG has higher revenues than EQH: HIG (28.9B) vs EQH (11.3B).
EQHHIGEQH / HIG
Capitalization13B38.9B33%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD1.4283.91436%
P/E Ratio37.889.80386%
Revenue11.3B28.9B39%
Total Cash41.1B21B196%
Total Debt6.93B4.37B158%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EQH vs HIG: Fundamental Ratings
EQH
HIG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2526
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
12
Undervalued
42
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
463
SMR RATING
1..100
10049
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4633
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
966
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EQH's Valuation (12) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as HIG (42) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that EQH’s stock grew similarly to HIG’s over the last 12 months.

HIG's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EQH (46) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that HIG’s stock grew somewhat faster than EQH’s over the last 12 months.

HIG's SMR Rating (49) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EQH (100) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that HIG’s stock grew somewhat faster than EQH’s over the last 12 months.

HIG's Price Growth Rating (33) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is in the same range as EQH (46) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that HIG’s stock grew similarly to EQH’s over the last 12 months.

EQH's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HIG (66) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that EQH’s stock grew somewhat faster than HIG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EQHHIG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
39%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
40%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
45%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EQH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HIG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JBDI1.290.14
+12.17%
JBDI Holdings Ltd
RNG55.622.14
+4.00%
RINGCENTRAL
RZLV2.430.05
+2.10%
Rezolve AI PLC
SY1.840.01
+0.55%
So-Young International
XYZ81.24-1.35
-1.63%
Block Inc

EQH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EQH has been closely correlated with CRBG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EQH jumps, then CRBG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EQH
1D Price
Change %
EQH100%
-2.52%
CRBG - EQH
84%
Closely correlated
-2.41%
AIG - EQH
69%
Closely correlated
-0.39%
HIG - EQH
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.80%
KKR - EQH
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.45%
BAM - EQH
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.92%
More

HIG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HIG has been closely correlated with TRV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HIG jumps, then TRV could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HIG
1D Price
Change %
HIG100%
-0.80%
TRV - HIG
88%
Closely correlated
-0.43%
L - HIG
86%
Closely correlated
-0.31%
CINF - HIG
84%
Closely correlated
+1.69%
ALL - HIG
81%
Closely correlated
-0.49%
THG - HIG
81%
Closely correlated
+1.10%
More