Advertisement
AIG vs EQH
Which Stock Would AI Choose? American International Group (AIG) vs. Equitable Holdings (EQH) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- AIG is a global property and casualty (P&C) insurer, while EQH is a diversified financial services holding company spanning retirement, asset management, and wealth management.
- AIG returned to full-year profitability in 2025 and reported improving underwriting margins, while EQH posted a full-year net loss tied to mark-to-market accounting and elevated mortality claims, despite solid non-GAAP operating earnings.
- Tickeron AI Verdict: AIG — the AI currently favors American International Group on the strength of its more consistent trend, cleaner operational momentum, and improving return profile.
- AIG returned about $6.8 billion to shareholders in 2025, versus roughly $1.8 billion for EQH.
- For additional detail, explore AIG Major News and AIG Today's Price Move, as well as EQH Major News and EQH Today's Price Move.
- To see how algorithmic strategies are positioning across the market, explore the Trending AI Robots page.
Introduction
Investors weighing exposure to the U.S. financials and insurance sectors often encounter two very different business models under the tickers AIG and EQH. American International Group is a streamlined global commercial insurer, while Equitable Holdings is a diversified platform built around retirement products, the AllianceBernstein asset manager, and a wealth management network. This stock comparison examines their recent relative performance, growth drivers, risk factors, and market positioning to help both long-term investors and active traders understand how the two names stack up in the current environment.
AIG Overview and Recent Performance
American International Group (AIG) is a global P&C (property and casualty) insurer that has spent recent years simplifying its business, including reducing its stake in life-and-retirement spinoff Corebridge Financial. In 2025, the company swung from a net loss the prior year to net income of roughly $3.1 billion, supported by stronger underwriting income and a full-year combined ratio of about 90.1% — a key insurance efficiency measure where a lower number is better. Recent quarters showed adjusted after-tax income and return on equity (ROE, a measure of profitability relative to shareholder capital) rising year over year. Management also returned about $6.8 billion to shareholders through buybacks and dividends and launched new ventures, including a Lloyd's syndicate with Blackstone and Amwins. This operational clarity has generally supported a steadier technical trend in recent weeks.
EQH Overview and Recent Performance
Equitable Holdings (EQH) operates through three complementary businesses: the Equitable retirement and protection franchise, asset manager AllianceBernstein (AB), and wealth manager Equitable Advisors. The company finished 2025 with a record $1.1 trillion in AUM/A (assets under management and administration), up 10% year over year, driven by strong retirement and wealth management net inflows. However, reported results were pressured by elevated mortality claims in its individual life segment and by mark-to-market accounting effects that produced a full-year net loss, even as non-GAAP operating earnings remained positive. A life reinsurance transaction with RGA reduced mortality exposure by roughly 75% and freed capital for buybacks. Wealth management earnings grew about 40% year over year, but sentiment has been mixed given the accounting-driven losses and net outflows at AllianceBernstein.
Trending AI Robots
For traders who prefer a systematic approach, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated view of algorithmic trading strategies. Tickeron maintains hundreds of AI trading bots that monitor thousands of different tickers, but only those best suited to prevailing market conditions earn a place in the Trending section. These bots vary widely in trading style, strategy, timeframe, performance statistics, and the sets of tickers they trade — from short-term momentum models to longer-horizon trend-following systems. Browsing the section can help investors identify which automated approaches are currently aligned with market dynamics across names like AIG and EQH. Explore the Trending AI Robots to see which strategies are leading right now.
Head-to-Head Comparison
These two companies diverge sharply in business model and risk profile. AIG is concentrated in commercial P&C underwriting, where profitability hinges on pricing discipline and catastrophe losses; its streamlined structure has translated into improving margins and a positive earnings trajectory. EQH, by contrast, is more exposed to capital markets through AllianceBernstein and to actuarial variables such as mortality, which weighed on recent results even as its wealth and retirement segments gained momentum.
From a momentum standpoint, AIG has shown more consistent trend characteristics, while EQH has contended with a negative P/E ratio and a more volatile earnings narrative. On valuation, EQH trades at a smaller market capitalization and reflects a higher-risk, higher-recovery profile tied to its reinsurance de-risking and share-repurchase tailwind. The trade-off is between AIG's steadier operational improvement and EQH's restructuring-driven potential, balanced against its near-term accounting and mortality headwinds.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors — trend consistency, earnings stability, and relative positioning — Tickeron's AI currently leans toward AIG. The insurer's return to profitability, improving underwriting margins, and consistent capital returns present a cleaner, more stable momentum profile than EQH's mix of strong asset growth and accounting-driven losses. While EQH retains meaningful catalysts from its reinsurance de-risking and buyback program, the AI's probabilistic assessment favors the steadier trend and clearer operational momentum currently visible in AIG.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AIG is a StrongBuy and EQH is a StrongBuy.
AIG in upward trend: price may jump up because it broke its lower Bollinger Band on November 06, 2026
AIG may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options. In 25 of 36 cases where AIG's price broke its lower Bollinger Band, its price rose further in the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 69%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on November 10, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on AIG as a result. In 60 of 98 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 61%.
AIG moved above its 50-day moving average on October 08, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.
The 10-day moving average for AIG crossed bullishly above the 50-day moving average on October 13, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted higher and could be considered a buy signal. In 12 of 20 past instances when the 10-day crossed above the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 60%.
The 50-day moving average for AIG moved above the 200-day moving average on October 15, 2026. This could be a long-term bullish signal for the stock as the stock shifts to an upward trend.
Following a +5.88% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where AIG advanced for three days, in 191 of 332 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 58%.
The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 172 of 289 cases where AIG Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 60%.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The 10-day RSI Indicator for AIG moved out of overbought territory on October 23, 2026. This could be a bearish sign for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 30 similar instances where the indicator moved out of overbought territory. In 14 of the 30 cases, the stock moved lower in the following days. This puts the odds of a move lower at 47%.
The Stochastic Oscillator may be shifting from an upward trend to a downward trend. In 32 of 67 cases where AIG's Stochastic Oscillator exited the overbought zone, the price fell further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 48%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for AIG turned negative on November 03, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 57 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 28 of the 57 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 49%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where AIG declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 49%.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 18 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating low risk on high returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 57, placing this stock better than average.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 36 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. AIG’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 43 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to consistent earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 50 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 60 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (1.001) is normal, around the industry mean (1.586). P/E Ratio (14.060) is within average values for comparable stocks, (13.804). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.614) is also within normal values, averaging (0.465). Dividend Yield (0.026) settles around the average of (0.061) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (1.555) is also within normal values, averaging (1.806).
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 97 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
EQH in upward trend: price rose above 50-day moving average on November 09, 2026
EQH moved above its 50-day moving average on November 09, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend. In 29 of 39 similar past instances, the stock price increased further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 74%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on November 09, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on EQH as a result. In 61 of 90 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 68%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for EQH just turned positive on November 10, 2026. Looking at past instances where EQH's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 29 of 46 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 63%.
Following a +5.45% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where EQH advanced for three days, in 233 of 351 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 66%.
The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 154 of 251 cases where EQH Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 61%.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Stochastic Oscillator may be shifting from an upward trend to a downward trend. In 38 of 65 cases where EQH's Stochastic Oscillator exited the overbought zone, the price fell further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 58%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where EQH declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 67%.
EQH broke above its upper Bollinger Band on November 04, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 9 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is seriously undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: EQH's P/B Ratio (-7.752) is slightly lower than the industry average of (2.412). P/E Ratio (-16.006) is within average values for comparable stocks, (-2.386). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.030) is also within normal values, averaging (1.319). Dividend Yield (0.023) settles around the average of (0.270) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (1.452) is also within normal values, averaging (15.694).
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 31 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating low risk on high returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 80, placing this stock better than average.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 41 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. EQH’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 58 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to consistent earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 75 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
AIG | EQH | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 26 | 35 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 60 Fair valued | 9 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 18 | 31 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 97 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 36 | 41 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 43 | 58 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
EQH's Valuation (9) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AIG (60) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that EQH’s stock grew somewhat faster than AIG’s over the last 12 months.
AIG's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is in the same range as EQH (31) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that AIG’s stock grew similarly to EQH’s over the last 12 months.
AIG's SMR Rating (97) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is in the same range as EQH (100) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that AIG’s stock grew similarly to EQH’s over the last 12 months.
AIG's Price Growth Rating (36) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is in the same range as EQH (41) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that AIG’s stock grew similarly to EQH’s over the last 12 months.
AIG's P/E Growth Rating (43) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is in the same range as EQH (58) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that AIG’s stock grew similarly to EQH’s over the last 12 months.
| AIG | EQH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 47% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 48% | 2 days ago 58% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 68% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 49% | 2 days ago 63% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 65% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 66% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 66% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 49% | 6 days ago 67% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 61% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AIG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while EQH’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- AIG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- EQH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AIG’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EQH’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- AIG’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 4 bearish.
- EQH’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
AIG (@Multi-Line Insurance) experienced а +2.22% price change this week, while EQH (@Investment Managers) price change was +0.52% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Multi-Line Insurance industry was -2.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.80%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -2.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.76%.
Reported Earning Dates
AIG is expected to report earnings on Feb 16, 2027.
EQH is expected to report earnings on Feb 10, 2027.
Industries' Descriptions
@Multi-Line Insurance (-2.70% weekly)A multi-line insurance contract bundles together exposures to risk and covers them under a single contract. For providers of such policies, the bundle is a potential risk diversification strategy since their exposure gets spread over several factors, which helps them mitigate a financial burden if a catastrophic event were to occur. Other potential benefits include getting more premiums from including more than one type of insurance in a bundle, and getting a competitive edge by procuring multiple insurance contracts with a customer. Examples of companies in this industry are Berkshire Hathaway (which owns several insurance companies), Chubb Limited, American International Group, Inc. and Sun Life Financial Inc.
@Investment Managers (-2.64% weekly)Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.
Advertisement
EQH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EQH has been closely correlated with CRBG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EQH jumps, then CRBG could also see price increases.