Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EQNBX vs RMFCX
EQNBX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts EQNBX vs RMFCX
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$59.08
Change-$0.03 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.38B
EQNBX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EQNBX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jul 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EQNBX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 108B vs. EQNBX (657M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than EQNBX: RMFCX (1.27) vs EQNBX (1.16). EQNBX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: EQNBX (13 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). EQNBX (1.70) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). EQNBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than EQNBX: RMFCX (250) vs EQNBX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.37 vs. EQNBX (5.64). RMFCX (62.43) and EQNBX (59.71) have equivalent 5 years return.
| EQNBX | RMFCX | EQNBX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.91 | 180% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.70 | 0.91 | 187% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.494 | 8.896 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 657M | 108B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.16 | 1.27 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.64 | 10.37 | 54% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.76 | 28.73 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 59.71 | 62.43 | 96% |
| Returns for 10 years | 81.25 | 77.23 | 105% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement