EQS
Price
$1.10
Change
+$0.02 (+1.85%)
Updated
Dec 31 closing price
TSLX
Price
$21.30
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 31, 04:59 PM (EDT)
44 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

EQS vs TSLX

Header iconEQS vs TSLX Comparison
Open Charts EQS vs TSLXBanner chart's image
Equus Total Return
Price$1.10
Change+$0.02 (+1.85%)
Volume$14.17K
CapitalizationN/A
Sixth Street Specialty Lending
Price$21.30
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$794
CapitalizationN/A
EQS vs TSLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
EQS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TSLX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EQS vs. TSLX commentary
Jan 01, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EQS is a StrongBuy and TSLX is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 01, 2025
Stock price -- (EQS: $1.10 vs. TSLX: $21.30)
Brand notoriety: EQS and TSLX are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EQS: 123% vs. TSLX: 80%
Market capitalization -- EQS: $20.28M vs. TSLX: $1.94B
EQS [@Investment Managers] is valued at $20.28M. TSLX’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $1.94B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.91B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EQS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTSLX’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).

  • EQS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TSLX’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
According to our system of comparison, TSLX is a better buy in the long-term than EQS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EQS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TSLX’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EQS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • TSLX’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both EQS and TSLX are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

EQS (@Investment Managers) experienced а +2.80% price change this week, while TSLX (@Investment Managers) price change was +1.77% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.35%.

Reported Earning Dates

EQS is expected to report earnings on Nov 18, 2024.

TSLX is expected to report earnings on Feb 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.44% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TSLX($1.94B) has a higher market cap than EQS($20.3M). TSLX has higher P/E ratio than EQS: TSLX (8.11) vs EQS (1.85). TSLX YTD gains are higher at: 8.828 vs. EQS (-24.143). EQS has less debt than TSLX: EQS (18M) vs TSLX (1.78B). TSLX has higher revenues than EQS: TSLX (273M) vs EQS (15.1M).
EQSTSLXEQS / TSLX
Capitalization20.3M1.94B1%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-24.1438.828-273%
P/E Ratio1.858.1123%
Revenue15.1M273M6%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt18M1.78B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EQS vs TSLX: Fundamental Ratings
EQS
TSLX
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7474
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
75
Overvalued
14
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10021
SMR RATING
1..100
9414
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8249
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6029
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TSLX's Valuation (14) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EQS (75). This means that TSLX’s stock grew somewhat faster than EQS’s over the last 12 months.

TSLX's Profit vs Risk Rating (21) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for EQS (100). This means that TSLX’s stock grew significantly faster than EQS’s over the last 12 months.

TSLX's SMR Rating (14) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for EQS (94). This means that TSLX’s stock grew significantly faster than EQS’s over the last 12 months.

TSLX's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EQS (82). This means that TSLX’s stock grew somewhat faster than EQS’s over the last 12 months.

TSLX's P/E Growth Rating (29) in the null industry is in the same range as EQS (60). This means that TSLX’s stock grew similarly to EQS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EQSTSLX
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
34%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
41%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
EQS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TSLX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FEVCX19.390.05
+0.26%
First Eagle US Value C
DTMGX36.79N/A
N/A
BNY Mellon Tax Managed Growth A
GCAEX5.97N/A
N/A
Gabelli Equity Income A
RGLIX10.59N/A
N/A
RBC Global Equity Leaders I
JHDFX18.56-0.04
-0.22%
JPMorgan Hedged Equity 2 R5

EQS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EQS and AAMCF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EQS and AAMCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EQS
1D Price
Change %
EQS100%
+1.85%
AAMCF - EQS
30%
Poorly correlated
-56.18%
CION - EQS
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.33%
ICMB - EQS
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TSLX - EQS
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ALTI - EQS
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.45%
More

TSLX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TSLX has been loosely correlated with ARCC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TSLX jumps, then ARCC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TSLX
1D Price
Change %
TSLX100%
+0.76%
ARCC - TSLX
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.36%
NMFC - TSLX
59%
Loosely correlated
+1.16%
MAIN - TSLX
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.21%
GBDC - TSLX
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.85%
GLAD - TSLX
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.71%
More