EQX
Price
$5.75
Change
+$0.07 (+1.23%)
Updated
Jun 30 closing price
Capitalization
1.95B
29 days until earnings call
MTA
Price
$3.84
Change
+$0.03 (+0.79%)
Updated
Jun 30 closing price
Capitalization
284.03M
38 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

EQX vs MTA

Header iconEQX vs MTA Comparison
Open Charts EQX vs MTABanner chart's image
Equinox Gold
Price$5.75
Change+$0.07 (+1.23%)
Volume$11.06M
Capitalization1.95B
Metalla Royalty & Streaming
Price$3.84
Change+$0.03 (+0.79%)
Volume$196.56K
Capitalization284.03M
EQX vs MTA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EQX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MTA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EQX vs. MTA commentary
Jul 01, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EQX is a Hold and MTA is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 01, 2025
Stock price -- (EQX: $5.75 vs. MTA: $3.84)
Brand notoriety: EQX and MTA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EQX: 73% vs. MTA: 56%
Market capitalization -- EQX: $1.95B vs. MTA: $284.03M
EQX [@Precious Metals] is valued at $1.95B. MTA’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $284.03M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EQX’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMTA’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • EQX’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MTA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MTA is a better buy in the long-term than EQX.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EQX’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MTA’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EQX’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MTA’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MTA is a better buy in the short-term than EQX.

Price Growth

EQX (@Precious Metals) experienced а -6.05% price change this week, while MTA (@Precious Metals) price change was +5.49% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -0.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was +53.92%.

Reported Earning Dates

EQX is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

MTA is expected to report earnings on Aug 08, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-0.13% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EQX($1.95B) has a higher market cap than MTA($284M). MTA YTD gains are higher at: 52.988 vs. EQX (14.542). EQX has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 291M vs. MTA (-917K). EQX has more cash in the bank: 285M vs. MTA (14.1M). MTA has less debt than EQX: MTA (14.6M) vs EQX (945M). EQX has higher revenues than MTA: EQX (1.09B) vs MTA (4.6M).
EQXMTAEQX / MTA
Capitalization1.95B284M688%
EBITDA291M-917K-31,734%
Gain YTD14.54252.98827%
P/E Ratio68.11N/A-
Revenue1.09B4.6M23,678%
Total Cash285M14.1M2,021%
Total Debt945M14.6M6,473%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EQX vs MTA: Fundamental Ratings
EQX
MTA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6376
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
54
Fair valued
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
6590
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6338
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
53100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MTA's Valuation (50) in the null industry is in the same range as EQX (54). This means that MTA’s stock grew similarly to EQX’s over the last 12 months.

MTA's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as EQX (100). This means that MTA’s stock grew similarly to EQX’s over the last 12 months.

EQX's SMR Rating (65) in the null industry is in the same range as MTA (90). This means that EQX’s stock grew similarly to MTA’s over the last 12 months.

MTA's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as EQX (63). This means that MTA’s stock grew similarly to EQX’s over the last 12 months.

EQX's P/E Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MTA (100). This means that EQX’s stock grew somewhat faster than MTA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EQXMTA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EQX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MTA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IYEFX9.050.01
+0.11%
Macquarie Climate Solutions R
GCMCX28.72N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Mid Cap Value C
RSLBX60.82N/A
N/A
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2
SMMSX30.39N/A
N/A
Invesco Summit S
EQIIX13.13N/A
N/A
Allspring Emerging Markets Eq Advtg Inst

EQX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EQX has been closely correlated with WPM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EQX jumps, then WPM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EQX
1D Price
Change %
EQX100%
+1.23%
WPM - EQX
73%
Closely correlated
+2.83%
KGC - EQX
73%
Closely correlated
+5.11%
AGI - EQX
72%
Closely correlated
+3.79%
AEM - EQX
72%
Closely correlated
+2.42%
PAAS - EQX
71%
Closely correlated
+2.45%
More

MTA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MTA has been closely correlated with PAAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MTA jumps, then PAAS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MTA
1D Price
Change %
MTA100%
+0.79%
PAAS - MTA
72%
Closely correlated
+2.45%
MAG - MTA
69%
Closely correlated
+2.03%
CGAU - MTA
68%
Closely correlated
+2.12%
EQX - MTA
67%
Closely correlated
+1.23%
KGC - MTA
66%
Closely correlated
+5.11%
More