Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ERBAX vs RWBEX
ERBAX vs RWBEX Comparison
Open Charts ERBAX vs RWBEX
Eaton Vance RBA Equity Strategy Fd Cl A
Price$19.94
Change-$0.02 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets633.99M
American Funds Capital World Gr&Inc R2E
Price$72.43
Change+$0.05 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets137.49B
ERBAX vs RWBEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ERBAX vs. RWBEX commentary
Aug 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ERBAX is a StrongBuy and RWBEX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWBEX has more cash in the bank: 137B vs. ERBAX (634M). RWBEX pays higher dividends than ERBAX: RWBEX (1.06) vs ERBAX (0.55). ERBAX was incepted earlier than RWBEX: ERBAX (15 years) vs RWBEX (11 years). ERBAX (1.30) is less costly to investors than RWBEX (1.21). ERBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RWBEX (27.00). RWBEX has a lower initial minimum investment than ERBAX: RWBEX (250) vs ERBAX (1000). RWBEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.91 vs. ERBAX (9.17). RWBEX return over 5 years is better than : 45.19 vs. ERBAX (19.23).
| ERBAX | RWBEX | ERBAX / RWBEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 1.21 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 1.21 | 107% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.276 | 15.151 | 68% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 634M | 137B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.55 | 1.06 | 52% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.17 | 10.91 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.30 | 39.62 | 41% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.23 | 45.19 | 43% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.79 | 61.34 | 66% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement