It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ERIC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNOKBF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ERIC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NOKBF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
ERIC (@Telecommunications Equipment) experienced а -5.58% price change this week, while NOKBF (@Telecommunications Equipment) price change was -12.41% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Telecommunications Equipment industry was -4.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.43%, and the average quarterly price growth was +40.87%.
ERIC is expected to report earnings on Jan 23, 2026.
The Telecommunications Equipment industry produces voice and data communications equipment, which includes fiber optic delivery products, digital signal processors, high-speed voice, data and video delivery. Additionally, satellite systems, global positioning systems, wireless data systems, personal communications equipment, telephone handsets and payload equipment for satellites also fall into this category. Apple Inc., QUALCOMM Incorporated and Nokia are major global players in this segment.
| ERIC | NOKBF | ERIC / NOKBF | |
| Capitalization | 31.6B | 33.4B | 95% |
| EBITDA | 37.7B | 2.74B | 1,378% |
| Gain YTD | 19.435 | 36.986 | 53% |
| P/E Ratio | 11.94 | 32.38 | 37% |
| Revenue | 240B | 19.7B | 1,218% |
| Total Cash | 52.3B | 6.07B | 862% |
| Total Debt | 43.9B | 4.07B | 1,080% |
ERIC | NOKBF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 69 | 89 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 7 Undervalued | 10 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 67 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 36 | 82 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | 40 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 18 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ERIC's Valuation (7) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is in the same range as NOKBF (10) in the null industry. This means that ERIC’s stock grew similarly to NOKBF’s over the last 12 months.
NOKBF's Profit vs Risk Rating (67) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ERIC (100) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that NOKBF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ERIC’s over the last 12 months.
ERIC's SMR Rating (36) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NOKBF (82) in the null industry. This means that ERIC’s stock grew somewhat faster than NOKBF’s over the last 12 months.
NOKBF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as ERIC (47) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that NOKBF’s stock grew similarly to ERIC’s over the last 12 months.
NOKBF's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for ERIC (100) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that NOKBF’s stock grew significantly faster than ERIC’s over the last 12 months.
| ERIC | NOKBF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 53% | 1 day ago 44% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | 1 day ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 57% | 1 day ago 61% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 62% | 1 day ago 61% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | 1 day ago 59% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | 1 day ago 60% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 66% | 12 days ago 64% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 62% | 1 day ago 60% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 59% | 1 day ago 74% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 58% | 1 day ago 70% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| HEAT | 30.74 | N/A | N/A |
| Touchstone Climate Transition ETF | |||
| NQP | 12.12 | -0.02 | -0.16% |
| Nuveen Pennsylvania Quality Municipal Income Fund | |||
| YMAR | 25.86 | -0.21 | -0.81% |
| FT Vest Intl Eq Mod Bffr ETF Mar | |||
| SUSA | 133.35 | -2.02 | -1.49% |
| iShares ESG Optimized MSCI USA ETF | |||
| GQQQ | 28.58 | -0.66 | -2.27% |
| Astoria US Quality Growth Kings ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NOKBF has been closely correlated with NOK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NOKBF jumps, then NOK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NOKBF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NOKBF | 100% | -0.99% | ||
| NOK - NOKBF | 71% Closely correlated | -2.65% | ||
| ERIC - NOKBF | 35% Loosely correlated | -0.21% | ||
| ZBRA - NOKBF | 25% Poorly correlated | -1.11% | ||
| UI - NOKBF | 22% Poorly correlated | -3.67% | ||
| HPE - NOKBF | 22% Poorly correlated | -2.82% | ||
More | ||||