ERIXF
Price
$7.43
Change
-$0.44 (-5.59%)
Updated
Apr 2 closing price
Capitalization
16.82B
FKWL
Price
$4.80
Change
-$0.97 (-16.81%)
Updated
Apr 7, 02:37 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
35.23M
51 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

ERIXF vs FKWL

Header iconERIXF vs FKWL Comparison
Open Charts ERIXF vs FKWLBanner chart's image
Ericsson (L.M.) Telephone
Price$7.43
Change-$0.44 (-5.59%)
Volume$3K
Capitalization16.82B
Franklin Wireless
Price$4.80
Change-$0.97 (-16.81%)
Volume$100
Capitalization35.23M
ERIXF vs FKWL Comparison Chart
Loading...
FKWL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ERIXF vs. FKWL commentary
Apr 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ERIXF is a Hold and FKWL is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 07, 2025
Stock price -- (ERIXF: $7.43 vs. FKWL: $5.77)
Brand notoriety: ERIXF and FKWL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Telecommunications Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ERIXF: 1% vs. FKWL: 49%
Market capitalization -- ERIXF: $16.82B vs. FKWL: $35.23M
ERIXF [@Telecommunications Equipment] is valued at $16.82B. FKWL’s [@Telecommunications Equipment] market capitalization is $35.23M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Telecommunications Equipment] industry ranges from $202.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Telecommunications Equipment] industry is $5.3B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ERIXF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFKWL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ERIXF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FKWL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FKWL is a better buy in the long-term than ERIXF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FKWL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • FKWL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

ERIXF (@Telecommunications Equipment) experienced а -9.94% price change this week, while FKWL (@Telecommunications Equipment) price change was +3.04% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Telecommunications Equipment industry was -7.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -9.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.30%.

Reported Earning Dates

FKWL is expected to report earnings on May 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Telecommunications Equipment (-7.71% weekly)

The Telecommunications Equipment industry produces voice and data communications equipment, which includes fiber optic delivery products, digital signal processors, high-speed voice, data and video delivery. Additionally, satellite systems, global positioning systems, wireless data systems, personal communications equipment, telephone handsets and payload equipment for satellites also fall into this category. Apple Inc., QUALCOMM Incorporated and Nokia are major global players in this segment.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ERIXF($16.8B) has a higher market cap than FKWL($35.2M). FKWL has higher P/E ratio than ERIXF: FKWL (24.15) vs ERIXF (14.51). FKWL YTD gains are higher at: 17.755 vs. ERIXF (-7.776). ERIXF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 29.9B vs. FKWL (-1.17M). ERIXF has more cash in the bank: 37.9B vs. FKWL (32.7M). FKWL has less debt than ERIXF: FKWL (0) vs ERIXF (42.5B). ERIXF has higher revenues than FKWL: ERIXF (281B) vs FKWL (47.4M).
ERIXFFKWLERIXF / FKWL
Capitalization16.8B35.2M47,727%
EBITDA29.9B-1.17M-2,559,544%
Gain YTD-7.77617.755-44%
P/E Ratio14.5124.1560%
Revenue281B47.4M592,827%
Total Cash37.9B32.7M115,902%
Total Debt42.5B0-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ERIXF vs FKWL: Fundamental Ratings
ERIXF
FKWL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
89
Overvalued
60
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9786
SMR RATING
1..100
8991
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5439
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
553
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FKWL's Valuation (60) in the null industry is in the same range as ERIXF (89). This means that FKWL’s stock grew similarly to ERIXF’s over the last 12 months.

FKWL's Profit vs Risk Rating (86) in the null industry is in the same range as ERIXF (97). This means that FKWL’s stock grew similarly to ERIXF’s over the last 12 months.

ERIXF's SMR Rating (89) in the null industry is in the same range as FKWL (91). This means that ERIXF’s stock grew similarly to FKWL’s over the last 12 months.

FKWL's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as ERIXF (54). This means that FKWL’s stock grew similarly to ERIXF’s over the last 12 months.

FKWL's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ERIXF (55). This means that FKWL’s stock grew somewhat faster than ERIXF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FKWL
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FKWL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SOND1.94-0.06
-3.00%
Sonder Holdings
WHF9.00-0.35
-3.79%
WhiteHorse Finance
TPC20.39-1.24
-5.73%
Tutor Perini Corp
NFG73.03-5.77
-7.32%
National Fuel Gas Co
HES133.56-14.82
-9.99%
Hess Corp

ERIXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ERIXF has been loosely correlated with ERIC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ERIXF jumps, then ERIC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ERIXF
1D Price
Change %
ERIXF100%
N/A
ERIC - ERIXF
40%
Loosely correlated
-6.82%
NOK - ERIXF
20%
Poorly correlated
-4.02%
FKWL - ERIXF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MFCO - ERIXF
2%
Poorly correlated
-14.67%
EVTZF - ERIXF
2%
Poorly correlated
-6.03%
More

FKWL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FKWL and ITRN have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FKWL and ITRN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FKWL
1D Price
Change %
FKWL100%
N/A
ITRN - FKWL
22%
Poorly correlated
-6.43%
ZBRA - FKWL
22%
Poorly correlated
-6.29%
VSAT - FKWL
22%
Poorly correlated
-3.68%
BOXL - FKWL
21%
Poorly correlated
-9.22%
LTRX - FKWL
21%
Poorly correlated
-6.73%
More