Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ERLVX vs RWMHX
ERLVX vs RWMHX Comparison
Open Charts ERLVX vs RWMHX
Eaton Vance Large-Cap Value R6
Price$27.10
Change-$0.14 (-0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.39B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5E
Price$65.89
Change-$0.23 (-0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets204.42B
ERLVX vs RWMHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ERLVX vs. RWMHX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ERLVX is a Hold and RWMHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMHX has more cash in the bank: 204B vs. ERLVX (1.39B). RWMHX pays higher dividends than ERLVX: RWMHX (1.33) vs ERLVX (1.14). ERLVX was incepted earlier than RWMHX: ERLVX (11 years) vs RWMHX (10 years). ERLVX (0.70) is less costly to investors than RWMHX (0.41). ERLVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. RWMHX (29.00). RWMHX has a lower initial minimum investment than ERLVX: RWMHX (250) vs ERLVX (5000000). RWMHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.91 vs. ERLVX (0.09). RWMHX return over 5 years is better than : 43.18 vs. ERLVX (40.24).
| ERLVX | RWMHX | ERLVX / RWMHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.41 | 171% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.41 | 171% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.704 | 8.429 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.39B | 204B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.14 | 1.33 | 86% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.09 | 3.91 | 2% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.85 | 29.08 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.24 | 43.18 | 93% |
| Returns for 10 years | 56.94 | 71.17 | 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement