ERMAY
Price
$6.35
Change
+$0.20 (+3.25%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
1.88B
LTMCF
Price
$0.34
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
70.22M
Interact to see
Advertisement

ERMAY vs LTMCF

Header iconERMAY vs LTMCF Comparison
Open Charts ERMAY vs LTMCFBanner chart's image
Eramet-SLN
Price$6.35
Change+$0.20 (+3.25%)
Volume$2.52K
Capitalization1.88B
Lithium Chile
Price$0.34
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$160.06K
Capitalization70.22M
ERMAY vs LTMCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ERMAY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LTMCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ERMAY vs. LTMCF commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ERMAY is a Buy and LTMCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (ERMAY: $6.35 vs. LTMCF: $0.34)
Brand notoriety: ERMAY and LTMCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ERMAY: 106% vs. LTMCF: 938%
Market capitalization -- ERMAY: $1.88B vs. LTMCF: $70.22M
ERMAY [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $1.88B. LTMCF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $70.22M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ERMAY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLTMCF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ERMAY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LTMCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ERMAY is a better buy in the long-term than LTMCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ERMAY’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LTMCF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ERMAY’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • LTMCF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ERMAY is a better buy in the short-term than LTMCF.

Price Growth

ERMAY (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +5.13% price change this week, while LTMCF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -4.18% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +5.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +42.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +308.83%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+5.57% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ERMAY($1.88B) has a higher market cap than LTMCF($70.2M). ERMAY has higher P/E ratio than LTMCF: ERMAY (108.65) vs LTMCF (46.78). ERMAY YTD gains are higher at: 26.560 vs. LTMCF (-37.833). ERMAY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 119M vs. LTMCF (-2.93M). ERMAY has more cash in the bank: 746M vs. LTMCF (448K). ERMAY has higher revenues than LTMCF: ERMAY (2.89B) vs LTMCF (0).
ERMAYLTMCFERMAY / LTMCF
Capitalization1.88B70.2M2,672%
EBITDA119M-2.93M-4,066%
Gain YTD26.560-37.833-70%
P/E Ratio108.6546.78232%
Revenue2.89B0-
Total Cash746M448K166,518%
Total Debt2.47BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ERMAY vs LTMCF: Fundamental Ratings
ERMAY
LTMCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
883
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
87
Overvalued
79
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7389
SMR RATING
1..100
9688
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4891
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4715
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LTMCF's Valuation (79) in the null industry is in the same range as ERMAY (87). This means that LTMCF’s stock grew similarly to ERMAY’s over the last 12 months.

ERMAY's Profit vs Risk Rating (73) in the null industry is in the same range as LTMCF (89). This means that ERMAY’s stock grew similarly to LTMCF’s over the last 12 months.

LTMCF's SMR Rating (88) in the null industry is in the same range as ERMAY (96). This means that LTMCF’s stock grew similarly to ERMAY’s over the last 12 months.

ERMAY's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LTMCF (91). This means that ERMAY’s stock grew somewhat faster than LTMCF’s over the last 12 months.

LTMCF's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the null industry is in the same range as ERMAY (47). This means that LTMCF’s stock grew similarly to ERMAY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ERMAYLTMCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ERMAY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LTMCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BDST0.460.01
+2.22%
bebe stores, inc.
FLNCF0.15N/A
N/A
Freelancer Limited
HISEF3.30N/A
N/A
Hisense Kelon Electrical Holdings Co Ltd.
SWSDF1042.00N/A
N/A
Swiss Life Holding
MNSAF2.94-0.05
-1.61%
Mineros S.A.

ERMAY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ERMAY has been loosely correlated with RIO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ERMAY jumps, then RIO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ERMAY
1D Price
Change %
ERMAY100%
N/A
RIO - ERMAY
40%
Loosely correlated
+2.44%
BHP - ERMAY
39%
Loosely correlated
+4.09%
FSUGY - ERMAY
37%
Loosely correlated
-0.91%
LYSDY - ERMAY
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.13%
ERMAF - ERMAY
33%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More

LTMCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LTMCF and LAC have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LTMCF and LAC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LTMCF
1D Price
Change %
LTMCF100%
-0.13%
LAC - LTMCF
25%
Poorly correlated
+22.63%
PMETF - LTMCF
24%
Poorly correlated
+2.17%
MP - LTMCF
22%
Poorly correlated
+8.28%
ERMAY - LTMCF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GLCNF - LTMCF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.23%
More