ESAB
Price
$111.99
Change
+$0.44 (+0.39%)
Updated
Nov 26 closing price
Capitalization
6.8B
103 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FRD
Price
$19.86
Change
+$0.13 (+0.66%)
Updated
Nov 26 closing price
Capitalization
141.53M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ESAB vs FRD

Header iconESAB vs FRD Comparison
Open Charts ESAB vs FRDBanner chart's image
ESAB
Price$111.99
Change+$0.44 (+0.39%)
Volume$464.77K
Capitalization6.8B
Friedman Industries
Price$19.86
Change+$0.13 (+0.66%)
Volume$18.75K
Capitalization141.53M
ESAB vs FRD Comparison Chart in %
ESAB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FRD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ESAB vs. FRD commentary
Nov 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ESAB is a StrongBuy and FRD is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 28, 2025
Stock price -- (ESAB: $111.99 vs. FRD: $19.90)
Brand notoriety: ESAB and FRD are both not notable
ESAB represents the Metal Fabrication, while FRD is part of the Steel industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ESAB: 95% vs. FRD: 102%
Market capitalization -- ESAB: $6.8B vs. FRD: $141.53M
ESAB [@Metal Fabrication] is valued at $6.8B. FRD’s [@Steel] market capitalization is $141.53M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Metal Fabrication] industry ranges from $56.71B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Steel] industry ranges from $36.42B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Metal Fabrication] industry is $2.39B. The average market capitalization across the [@Steel] industry is $5.97B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ESAB’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFRD’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ESAB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FRD’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FRD is a better buy in the long-term than ESAB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ESAB’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FRD’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ESAB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FRD’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ESAB is a better buy in the short-term than FRD.

Price Growth

ESAB (@Metal Fabrication) experienced а +6.71% price change this week, while FRD (@Steel) price change was +0.10% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Metal Fabrication industry was -0.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.91%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.69%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Steel industry was +2.73%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.46%.

Reported Earning Dates

ESAB is expected to report earnings on Mar 10, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Metal Fabrication (-0.33% weekly)

The industry is involved in value-added processes including creation of metal structures like machines and parts by cutting, bending and assembling, using various raw materials. A fabrication shop often bids on a project/job, and then builds the product if awarded the contract. Robotics and automation are making their way into the industry apparently to fill in skills gap[s19] . RBC Bearings Incorporated, Timken Company and Valmont Industries, Inc. are some of the largest metal fabrication companies in the U.S.

@Steel (+2.73% weekly)

The steel industry includes manufacturers of steel and steel-related products. Companies use iron ore and scrap steel to produce steel. The industry also includes companies involved in mining and marketing of steel products. Along with serving some of the domestic markets, U.S. steel output has, over the years, been used by international economies as well. Competition from imported steel has also increased over time. The industry could be susceptible to business cycles, since the element is an important input in industrial production. Some of the globally-renowned steel behemoths include Nucor Corporation, Vale, and ArcelorMittal SA.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ESAB($6.8B) has a higher market cap than FRD($142M). ESAB has higher P/E ratio than FRD: ESAB (25.05) vs FRD (12.18). FRD YTD gains are higher at: 31.433 vs. ESAB (-6.404). ESAB has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 512M vs. FRD (17.3M). ESAB has more cash in the bank: 218M vs. FRD (2.1M). FRD has less debt than ESAB: FRD (35.8M) vs ESAB (1.47B). ESAB has higher revenues than FRD: ESAB (2.79B) vs FRD (465M).
ESABFRDESAB / FRD
Capitalization6.8B142M4,788%
EBITDA512M17.3M2,960%
Gain YTD-6.40431.433-20%
P/E Ratio25.0512.18206%
Revenue2.79B465M600%
Total Cash218M2.1M10,386%
Total Debt1.47B35.8M4,098%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRD: Fundamental Ratings
FRD
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
79
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
18
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
26
SMR RATING
1..100
76
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
49
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
49
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
13

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ESABFRD
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ESAB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FRD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RFNGX96.550.90
+0.94%
American Funds Fundamental Invs R6
BUIMX16.38N/A
N/A
Buffalo Mid Cap Growth Inst
VYCBX27.39N/A
N/A
Voya Corporate Leaders 100 C
MMNBX8.32N/A
N/A
MassMutual Diversified Value Y
BGRIX80.99-0.37
-0.46%
Baron Growth Instl

ESAB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ESAB has been loosely correlated with MLI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ESAB jumps, then MLI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ESAB
1D Price
Change %
ESAB100%
+0.39%
MLI - ESAB
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.50%
NWPX - ESAB
53%
Loosely correlated
+1.02%
PRLB - ESAB
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.16%
MEC - ESAB
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.42%
RS - ESAB
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.33%
More

FRD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FRD and IIIN have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FRD and IIIN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRD
1D Price
Change %
FRD100%
+0.86%
IIIN - FRD
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.19%
RYI - FRD
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.44%
NWPX - FRD
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.02%
SID - FRD
22%
Poorly correlated
+3.87%
ESAB - FRD
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.39%
More