It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ESAB’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while.
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ESAB’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NNBR’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
ESAB (@Metal Fabrication) experienced а +6.12% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Metal Fabrication industry was +6.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.47%.
ESAB is expected to report earnings on Mar 11, 2025.
The industry is involved in value-added processes including creation of metal structures like machines and parts by cutting, bending and assembling, using various raw materials. A fabrication shop often bids on a project/job, and then builds the product if awarded the contract. Robotics and automation are making their way into the industry apparently to fill in skills gap[s19] . RBC Bearings Incorporated, Timken Company and Valmont Industries, Inc. are some of the largest metal fabrication companies in the U.S.
ESAB | NNBR | ESAB / NNBR | |
Capitalization | 8.05B | 233M | 3,453% |
EBITDA | 520M | 13.5M | 3,852% |
Gain YTD | 54.001 | -7.625 | -708% |
P/E Ratio | 28.47 | N/A | - |
Revenue | 2.76B | 489M | 564% |
Total Cash | 254M | 21.9M | 1,160% |
Total Debt | 1.17B | 206M | 569% |
NNBR | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 77 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 85 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 96 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 52 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 96 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ESAB | NNBR | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago24% | 2 days ago83% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago41% | 2 days ago76% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago71% | 2 days ago83% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago68% | 2 days ago78% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago77% | 2 days ago84% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago79% | 2 days ago83% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago75% | 2 days ago81% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago57% | 14 days ago89% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago35% | 2 days ago76% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago79% | 2 days ago84% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
CZA | 111.83 | 2.98 | +2.74% |
Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF | |||
FTCS | 91.83 | 1.73 | +1.92% |
First Trust Capital Strength ETF | |||
HDLB | 14.69 | 0.16 | +1.09% |
ETRACS Mny Py 2xLgd US Hg Dv Lw Vl ETN B | |||
FJAN | 45.35 | 0.30 | +0.66% |
FT Cboe Vest US Equity Buffer ETF Jan | |||
HSUN | 34.69 | -0.10 | -0.29% |
Hartford Strategic Income ETF |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ESAB has been loosely correlated with MLI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ESAB jumps, then MLI could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ESAB | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ESAB | 100% | +5.06% | ||
MLI - ESAB | 47% Loosely correlated | +12.12% | ||
IIIN - ESAB | 43% Loosely correlated | +8.22% | ||
RS - ESAB | 41% Loosely correlated | +11.87% | ||
PRLB - ESAB | 41% Loosely correlated | +12.24% | ||
NWPX - ESAB | 41% Loosely correlated | +1.84% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that NNBR and MATW have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NNBR and MATW's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NNBR | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
NNBR | 100% | +7.41% | ||
MATW - NNBR | 27% Poorly correlated | +6.61% | ||
CODI - NNBR | 23% Poorly correlated | +7.00% | ||
WOR - NNBR | 22% Poorly correlated | +10.46% | ||
ESAB - NNBR | 21% Poorly correlated | +5.06% | ||
TG - NNBR | 20% Poorly correlated | +7.91% | ||
More |