Advertisement
NNBR vs TG
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NNBR is a Buy and TG is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
NNBR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- NNBR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- TG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
NNBR’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- NNBR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
- TG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
NNBR (@Industrial Conglomerates) experienced а -7.57% price change this week, while TG (@Metal Fabrication) price change was -4.50% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Conglomerates industry was -3.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.16%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Metal Fabrication industry was -4.90%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.55%.
Reported Earning Dates
NNBR is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Industrial Conglomerates (-3.92% weekly)Industrial Conglomerates specialize in numerous types of products, most of which comprise industrial goods, while some also go towards meeting household needs. Honeywell (makes engineering services and aerospace systems), United Technologies Corporation(manufactures aircraft engines, aerospace systems, HVAC, elevators and escalators, fire and security, building systems, and industrial products, among others), 3M (over 60,000 products under several world-renowned brands, including adhesives, abrasives, laminates, passive fire protection, personal protective equipment, window films, paint protection films, dental and orthodontic products, electrical & electronic connecting and insulating materials, medical products, car-care products, electronic circuits, healthcare software and optical films).
@Metal Fabrication (-4.90% weekly)The industry is involved in value-added processes including creation of metal structures like machines and parts by cutting, bending and assembling, using various raw materials. A fabrication shop often bids on a project/job, and then builds the product if awarded the contract. Robotics and automation are making their way into the industry apparently to fill in skills gap[s19] . RBC Bearings Incorporated, Timken Company and Valmont Industries, Inc. are some of the largest metal fabrication companies in the U.S.
| NNBR | TG | NNBR / TG | |
| Capitalization | 180M | 259M | 69% |
| EBITDA | 18.1M | 60.4M | 30% |
| Gain YTD | 167.188 | 3.343 | 5,002% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 9.05 | - |
| Revenue | 435M | 745M | 58% |
| Total Cash | 8.47M | 15.6M | 54% |
| Total Debt | 211M | 58.9M | 358% |
NNBR | TG | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 88 | 85 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 79 Overvalued | 10 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 99 | 61 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 35 | 72 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 96 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TG's Valuation (10) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry is significantly better than the same rating for NNBR (79) in the Metal Fabrication industry. This means that TG’s stock grew significantly faster than NNBR’s over the last 12 months.
TG's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry is in the same range as NNBR (100) in the Metal Fabrication industry. This means that TG’s stock grew similarly to NNBR’s over the last 12 months.
TG's SMR Rating (61) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NNBR (99) in the Metal Fabrication industry. This means that TG’s stock grew somewhat faster than NNBR’s over the last 12 months.
NNBR's Price Growth Rating (35) in the Metal Fabrication industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TG (72) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry. This means that NNBR’s stock grew somewhat faster than TG’s over the last 12 months.
NNBR's P/E Growth Rating (96) in the Metal Fabrication industry is in the same range as TG (100) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry. This means that NNBR’s stock grew similarly to TG’s over the last 12 months.
| NNBR | TG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 67% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 73% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 69% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 63% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 79% | 1 day ago 68% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 5 days ago 69% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 65% |
Advertisement
NNBR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that NNBR and FIP have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NNBR and FIP's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NNBR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NNBR | 100% | -1.72% | ||
| FIP - NNBR | 23% Poorly correlated | -1.10% | ||
| WOR - NNBR | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.77% | ||
| OTTR - NNBR | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.11% | ||
| ESAB - NNBR | 21% Poorly correlated | -2.74% | ||
| TG - NNBR | 20% Poorly correlated | +0.41% | ||
More | ||||
TG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TG has been loosely correlated with CMC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TG jumps, then CMC could also see price increases.