Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ESAGX vs RNWBX
ESAGX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts ESAGX vs RNWBX
Ashmore Emerging Markets Equity ESG A
Price$13.50
Change+$0.05 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16.01M
American Funds New World R2
Price$90.79
Change-$0.09 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.73B
ESAGX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ESAGX vs. RNWBX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ESAGX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 74.7B vs. ESAGX (16M). ESAGX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: ESAGX (0.52) vs RNWBX (0.12). ESAGX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: ESAGX (6 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). ESAGX (2.43) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). ESAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 65.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than ESAGX: RNWBX (250) vs ESAGX (1000). ESAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.27 vs. RNWBX (14.08). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 24.45 vs. ESAGX (13.19).
| ESAGX | RNWBX | ESAGX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 1.67 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 1.67 | 146% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 28.853 | 23.562 | 122% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 16M | 74.7B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.52 | 0.12 | 431% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.27 | 14.08 | 151% |
| Returns for 3 years | 73.50 | 55.31 | 133% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.19 | 24.45 | 54% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 85.42 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement