Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ESAGX vs RNWBX
ESAGX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts ESAGX vs RNWBX
Ashmore Emerging Markets Equity ESG A
Price$11.95
Change-$0.05 (-0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets14.22M
American Funds New World R2
Price$84.96
Change-$0.11 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.34B
ESAGX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ESAGX vs. RNWBX commentary
Jul 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ESAGX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 70.3B vs. ESAGX (14.2M). ESAGX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: ESAGX (0.58) vs RNWBX (0.13). ESAGX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: ESAGX (5 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). ESAGX (2.43) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). ESAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 65.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than ESAGX: RNWBX (250) vs ESAGX (1000). ESAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.15 vs. RNWBX (11.66). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 21.65 vs. ESAGX (8.70).
| ESAGX | RNWBX | ESAGX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 1.67 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 1.67 | 146% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.962 | 15.663 | 96% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 14.2M | 70.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.58 | 0.13 | 455% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.15 | 11.66 | 156% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.46 | 35.74 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.70 | 21.65 | 40% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 63.82 | - |