ESALF
Price
$22.51
Change
-$4.09 (-15.38%)
Updated
Apr 9 closing price
Capitalization
18.29B
ETST
Price
$0.13
Change
+$0.01 (+8.33%)
Updated
Apr 9 closing price
Capitalization
23.62M
Ad is loading...

ESALF vs ETST

Header iconESALF vs ETST Comparison
Open Charts ESALF vs ETSTBanner chart's image
Eisai
Price$22.51
Change-$4.09 (-15.38%)
Volume$1.42K
Capitalization18.29B
Earth Science Tech
Price$0.13
Change+$0.01 (+8.33%)
Volume$12.64K
Capitalization23.62M
ESALF vs ETST Comparison Chart
Loading...
ETST
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ESALF vs. ETST commentary
Apr 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ESALF is a Hold and ETST is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 11, 2025
Stock price -- (ESALF: $22.51 vs. ETST: $0.13)
Brand notoriety: ESALF and ETST are both not notable
Both companies represent the Pharmaceuticals: Other industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ESALF: 31% vs. ETST: 15%
Market capitalization -- ESALF: $18.29B vs. ETST: $23.62M
ESALF [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] is valued at $18.29B. ETST’s [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] market capitalization is $23.62M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry ranges from $77.48B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry is $3.65B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ESALF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileETST’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ESALF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • ETST’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ESALF is a better buy in the long-term than ETST.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ETST’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • ETST’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

ESALF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) experienced а -13.95% price change this week, while ETST (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) price change was -0.77% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was +56.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.10%, and the average quarterly price growth was -16.15%.

Reported Earning Dates

ETST is expected to report earnings on Feb 10, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pharmaceuticals: Other (+56.31% weekly)

Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ESALF($18.3B) has a higher market cap than ETST($23.6M). ESALF has higher P/E ratio than ETST: ESALF (46.30) vs ETST (0.68). ETST YTD gains are higher at: 3.200 vs. ESALF (-12.378). ESALF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 87.3B vs. ETST (-167.31K). ESALF has more cash in the bank: 268B vs. ETST (92K). ETST has less debt than ESALF: ETST (633K) vs ESALF (126B). ESALF has higher revenues than ETST: ESALF (744B) vs ETST (268K).
ESALFETSTESALF / ETST
Capitalization18.3B23.6M77,542%
EBITDA87.3B-167.31K-52,178,591%
Gain YTD-12.3783.200-387%
P/E Ratio46.300.686,831%
Revenue744B268K277,611,940%
Total Cash268B92K291,304,348%
Total Debt126B633K19,905,213%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ESALF vs ETST: Fundamental Ratings
ESALF
ETST
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9014
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
5
Undervalued
66
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10063
SMR RATING
1..100
414
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7754
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
96100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a95

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ESALF's Valuation (5) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ETST (66). This means that ESALF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ETST’s over the last 12 months.

ETST's Profit vs Risk Rating (63) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ESALF (100). This means that ETST’s stock grew somewhat faster than ESALF’s over the last 12 months.

ESALF's SMR Rating (4) in the null industry is in the same range as ETST (14). This means that ESALF’s stock grew similarly to ETST’s over the last 12 months.

ETST's Price Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as ESALF (77). This means that ETST’s stock grew similarly to ESALF’s over the last 12 months.

ESALF's P/E Growth Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as ETST (100). This means that ESALF’s stock grew similarly to ETST’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ETST
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
ETST
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RWK104.019.21
+9.72%
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF
JIRE60.984.10
+7.21%
JPMorgan International Rsrch Enh Eq ETF
NCZ11.340.73
+6.88%
Virtus Convertible & Income Fund II
THLV26.130.57
+2.21%
THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF
UTHY42.370.27
+0.64%
US Treasury 30 Year Bond ETF

ESALF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ESALF and ESAIY have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ESALF and ESAIY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ESALF
1D Price
Change %
ESALF100%
-15.37%
ESAIY - ESALF
26%
Poorly correlated
-3.98%
DVAX - ESALF
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.38%
KHTRF - ESALF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.06%
SHPH - ESALF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.67%
BLMH - ESALF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.19%
More

ETST and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ETST and RSCI have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ETST and RSCI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ETST
1D Price
Change %
ETST100%
+12.17%
RSCI - ETST
22%
Poorly correlated
-58.33%
CXXIF - ETST
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.40%
ESALF - ETST
14%
Poorly correlated
-15.37%
HLTRF - ETST
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HKMPY - ETST
10%
Poorly correlated
-0.50%
More