It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ESALF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileHKMPF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ESALF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HKMPF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
ESALF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) experienced а -0.63% price change this week, while HKMPF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) price change was -3.26% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was +0.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.09%.
Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.
ESALF | HKMPF | ESALF / HKMPF | |
Capitalization | 18.3B | 5.93B | 308% |
EBITDA | 87.3B | 489M | 17,853% |
Gain YTD | -41.837 | 9.102 | -460% |
P/E Ratio | 46.30 | 31.65 | 146% |
Revenue | 744B | 2.52B | 29,559% |
Total Cash | 268B | 292M | 91,781% |
Total Debt | 126B | 1.28B | 9,821% |
ESALF | HKMPF | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 88 | 94 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 14 Undervalued | 16 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 96 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 5 | 91 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 87 | 49 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 82 | 59 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ESALF's Valuation (14) in the null industry is in the same range as HKMPF (16). This means that ESALF’s stock grew similarly to HKMPF’s over the last 12 months.
HKMPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as ESALF (100). This means that HKMPF’s stock grew similarly to ESALF’s over the last 12 months.
ESALF's SMR Rating (5) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for HKMPF (91). This means that ESALF’s stock grew significantly faster than HKMPF’s over the last 12 months.
HKMPF's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ESALF (87). This means that HKMPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ESALF’s over the last 12 months.
HKMPF's P/E Growth Rating (59) in the null industry is in the same range as ESALF (82). This means that HKMPF’s stock grew similarly to ESALF’s over the last 12 months.
ESALF | HKMPF | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago39% | 2 days ago36% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago47% | 2 days ago35% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago69% | 2 days ago35% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago31% | 2 days ago48% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago67% | 2 days ago35% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago69% | 2 days ago43% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago42% | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago67% | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago41% | 2 days ago61% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago68% | 2 days ago32% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that ESALF and ESAIY have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ESALF and ESAIY's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ESALF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ESALF | 100% | N/A | ||
ESAIY - ESALF | 26% Poorly correlated | +0.50% | ||
DVAX - ESALF | 23% Poorly correlated | +0.39% | ||
KHTRF - ESALF | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
SHPH - ESALF | 22% Poorly correlated | -9.54% | ||
BLMH - ESALF | 21% Poorly correlated | -3.49% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that HKMPF and AMPH have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HKMPF and AMPH's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HKMPF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
HKMPF | 100% | -3.26% | ||
AMPH - HKMPF | 24% Poorly correlated | +0.02% | ||
CAIHF - HKMPF | 24% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
HLTRF - HKMPF | 11% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
GRUSF - HKMPF | 9% Poorly correlated | +1.55% | ||
ESALF - HKMPF | 7% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |