Ad is loading...
ESBA
Price
$10.31
Change
-$0.18 (-1.72%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
SLG
Price
$75.68
Change
+$0.04 (+0.05%)
Updated
Nov 18, 11:49 AM (EDT)
65 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

ESBA vs SLG

Header iconESBA vs SLG Comparison
Open Charts ESBA vs SLGBanner chart's image
Empire State Realty OP
Price$10.31
Change-$0.18 (-1.72%)
Volume$268
CapitalizationN/A
SL Green Realty
Price$75.68
Change+$0.04 (+0.05%)
Volume$316
CapitalizationN/A
ESBA vs SLG Comparison Chart
Loading...
SLG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ESBA vs. SLG commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ESBA is a Sell and SLG is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (ESBA: $10.31 vs. SLG: $75.64)
Brand notoriety: ESBA and SLG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ESBA: 5% vs. SLG: 65%
Market capitalization -- ESBA: $2.62B vs. SLG: $3.57B
ESBA [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $2.62B. SLG’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $3.57B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $5.37B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ESBA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSLG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ESBA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SLG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SLG is a better buy in the long-term than ESBA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SLG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • SLG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

ESBA (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а -2.32% price change this week, while SLG (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was -6.30% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was -2.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.26%.

Reported Earning Dates

ESBA is expected to report earnings on Feb 15, 2023.

SLG is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (-2.03% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SLG($3.57B) has a higher market cap than ESBA($2.62B). ESBA has higher P/E ratio than SLG: ESBA (32.36) vs SLG (8.70). SLG YTD gains are higher at: 75.012 vs. ESBA (10.877). ESBA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 384M vs. SLG (-206.38M). ESBA has more cash in the bank: 347M vs. SLG (231M). ESBA has less debt than SLG: ESBA (2.27B) vs SLG (4.42B). SLG has higher revenues than ESBA: SLG (914M) vs ESBA (740M).
ESBASLGESBA / SLG
Capitalization2.62B3.57B73%
EBITDA384M-206.38M-186%
Gain YTD10.87775.01214%
P/E Ratio32.368.70372%
Revenue740M914M81%
Total Cash347M231M150%
Total Debt2.27B4.42B51%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ESBA vs SLG: Fundamental Ratings
ESBA
SLG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
63
Fair valued
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10068
SMR RATING
1..100
8188
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5237
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3995
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SLG's Valuation (50) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as ESBA (63). This means that SLG’s stock grew similarly to ESBA’s over the last 12 months.

SLG's Profit vs Risk Rating (68) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as ESBA (100). This means that SLG’s stock grew similarly to ESBA’s over the last 12 months.

ESBA's SMR Rating (81) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as SLG (88). This means that ESBA’s stock grew similarly to SLG’s over the last 12 months.

SLG's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as ESBA (52). This means that SLG’s stock grew similarly to ESBA’s over the last 12 months.

ESBA's P/E Growth Rating (39) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SLG (95). This means that ESBA’s stock grew somewhat faster than SLG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SLG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
SLG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VIVAX68.72-0.26
-0.38%
Vanguard Value Index Inv
RTNAX11.60-0.05
-0.43%
Russell Inv Tax-Managed Intl Eq A
LMVOX32.68-0.27
-0.82%
Lord Abbett Focused Small Cap Value F3
ARZMX17.78-0.15
-0.84%
AMG River Road Small Cap Value Z
LSCRX24.67-0.28
-1.12%
Loomis Sayles Small Cap Value Retail

ESBA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ESBA has been loosely correlated with ESRT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ESBA jumps, then ESRT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ESBA
1D Price
Change %
ESBA100%
-1.68%
ESRT - ESBA
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.47%
DEI - ESBA
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.49%
AAT - ESBA
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.88%
KRC - ESBA
40%
Loosely correlated
-1.52%
SLG - ESBA
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.54%
More