ESBA | SLG | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 43 | 16 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 36 Fair valued | 84 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 90 | 92 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | 50 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 54 | 65 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ESBA's Valuation (36) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SLG (84). This means that ESBA’s stock grew somewhat faster than SLG’s over the last 12 months.
ESBA's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as SLG (100). This means that ESBA’s stock grew similarly to SLG’s over the last 12 months.
ESBA's SMR Rating (90) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as SLG (92). This means that ESBA’s stock grew similarly to SLG’s over the last 12 months.
SLG's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as ESBA (60). This means that SLG’s stock grew similarly to ESBA’s over the last 12 months.
ESBA's P/E Growth Rating (54) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as SLG (65). This means that ESBA’s stock grew similarly to SLG’s over the last 12 months.
| ESBA | SLG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 74% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 73% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 73% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 74% | 6 days ago 71% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 60% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 81% |
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ESBA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while SLG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ESBA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLG’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
ESBA (@REIT - Office) experienced а +5.81% price change this week, while SLG (@REIT - Office) price change was +1.52% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @REIT - Office industry was +2.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was +347.73%.
SLG is expected to report earnings on Oct 21, 2026.
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| CFO | 79.55 | 0.20 | +0.25% |
| VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF (CFO) | |||
| BAMV | 36.80 | 0.09 | +0.24% |
| Brookstone Value Stock ETF (BAMV) | |||
| GMOC | 50.06 | N/A | N/A |
| GMO Ultra-Short Income ETF (GMOC) | |||
| QCLR | 28.35 | -0.04 | -0.16% |
| Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF (QCLR) | |||
| DTCR | 27.73 | -0.24 | -0.86% |
| Global X Data Center And Digital Infrastructure ETF (DTCR) | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ESBA has been loosely correlated with OGCP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ESBA jumps, then OGCP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ESBA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESBA | 100% | N/A | ||
| OGCP - ESBA | 39% Loosely correlated | +0.48% | ||
| SLG - ESBA | 38% Loosely correlated | +0.68% | ||
| CDP - ESBA | 38% Loosely correlated | +0.36% | ||
| KRC - ESBA | 36% Loosely correlated | +1.61% | ||
| VNO - ESBA | 36% Loosely correlated | +0.51% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SLG has been closely correlated with VNO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SLG jumps, then VNO could also see price increases.