ESBS
Price
$6.39
Change
-$0.06 (-0.93%)
Updated
Jun 5 closing price
Capitalization
28.53M
FTFI
Price
$29.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
May 28 closing price
Capitalization
47.97M
Interact to see
Advertisement

ESBS vs FTFI

Header iconESBS vs FTFI Comparison
Open Charts ESBS vs FTFIBanner chart's image
ES Bancshares
Price$6.39
Change-$0.06 (-0.93%)
Volume$2.65K
Capitalization28.53M
First Berlin Ban
Price$29.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2.27K
Capitalization47.97M
ESBS vs FTFI Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ESBS vs. FTFI commentary
Jun 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ESBS is a Hold and FTFI is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 06, 2025
Stock price -- (ESBS: $6.39 vs. FTFI: $29.00)
Brand notoriety: ESBS and FTFI are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ESBS: 123% vs. FTFI: 232%
Market capitalization -- ESBS: $28.53M vs. FTFI: $47.97M
ESBS [@Regional Banks] is valued at $28.53M. FTFI’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $47.97M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ESBS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFTFI’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ESBS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FTFI’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FTFI is a better buy in the long-term than ESBS.

Price Growth

ESBS (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.54% price change this week, while FTFI (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.82%.

Reported Earning Dates

ESBS is expected to report earnings on Apr 18, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.22% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTFI($48M) has a higher market cap than ESBS($28.5M). ESBS has higher P/E ratio than FTFI: ESBS (10.63) vs FTFI (6.29). FTFI YTD gains are higher at: 23.404 vs. ESBS (-1.692). FTFI has less debt than ESBS: FTFI (51.3M) vs ESBS (91.7M). FTFI has higher revenues than ESBS: FTFI (26.3M) vs ESBS (18.2M).
ESBSFTFIESBS / FTFI
Capitalization28.5M48M59%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-1.69223.404-7%
P/E Ratio10.636.29169%
Revenue18.2M26.3M69%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt91.7M51.3M179%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ESBS: Fundamental Ratings
ESBS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
88
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
87
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
38
SMR RATING
1..100
54
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
52
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
24
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ADPV34.280.16
+0.46%
Adaptiv™ Select ETF
BBSB98.64-0.09
-0.09%
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. TrsBd1-3YrETF
DDEC40.68-0.08
-0.20%
FT Vest US Equity Dp Bfr ETF Dec
EPS61.49-0.23
-0.37%
WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Fund
OEF289.80-2.61
-0.89%
iShares S&P 100 ETF

ESBS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ESBS and QNBC have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ESBS and QNBC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ESBS
1D Price
Change %
ESBS100%
-0.93%
QNBC - ESBS
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OTPBF - ESBS
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MTRBF - ESBS
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EBKOF - ESBS
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.73%
FTFI - ESBS
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

FTFI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FTFI and PGNN have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FTFI and PGNN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FTFI
1D Price
Change %
FTFI100%
N/A
PGNN - FTFI
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.83%
OTPBF - FTFI
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BOID - FTFI
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MFDB - FTFI
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HMST - FTFI
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.16%
More