ESBS
Price
$7.32
Change
-$0.01 (-0.14%)
Updated
Aug 18 closing price
Capitalization
50.72M
QNBC
Price
$35.70
Change
+$0.68 (+1.94%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Capitalization
132.84M
61 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ESBS vs QNBC

Header iconESBS vs QNBC Comparison
Open Charts ESBS vs QNBCBanner chart's image
ES Bancshares
Price$7.32
Change-$0.01 (-0.14%)
Volume$600
Capitalization50.72M
QNB
Price$35.70
Change+$0.68 (+1.94%)
Volume$500
Capitalization132.84M
ESBS vs QNBC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ESBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QNBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ESBS vs. QNBC commentary
Aug 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ESBS is a StrongBuy and QNBC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 28, 2025
Stock price -- (ESBS: $7.32 vs. QNBC: $35.70)
Brand notoriety: ESBS and QNBC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ESBS: 29% vs. QNBC: 36%
Market capitalization -- ESBS: $50.72M vs. QNBC: $132.84M
ESBS [@Regional Banks] is valued at $50.72M. QNBC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $132.84M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $170.51B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.87B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ESBS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileQNBC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ESBS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • QNBC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, QNBC is a better buy in the long-term than ESBS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ESBS’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QNBC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ESBS’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • QNBC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, QNBC is a better buy in the short-term than ESBS.

Price Growth

ESBS (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while QNBC (@Regional Banks) price change was +2.03% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.62%.

Reported Earning Dates

QNBC is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.09% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QNBC($133M) has a higher market cap than ESBS($50.7M). ESBS has higher P/E ratio than QNBC: ESBS (69.15) vs QNBC (10.26). ESBS YTD gains are higher at: 12.646 vs. QNBC (7.579). ESBS has less debt than QNBC: ESBS (57.3M) vs QNBC (107M). QNBC has higher revenues than ESBS: QNBC (53.1M) vs ESBS (14.9M).
ESBSQNBCESBS / QNBC
Capitalization50.7M133M38%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD12.6467.579167%
P/E Ratio69.1510.26674%
Revenue14.9M53.1M28%
Total CashN/A17.7M-
Total Debt57.3M107M54%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ESBS vs QNBC: Fundamental Ratings
ESBS
QNBC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9531
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
94
Overvalued
25
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3140
SMR RATING
1..100
8850
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4852
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9577
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

QNBC's Valuation (25) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for ESBS (94). This means that QNBC’s stock grew significantly faster than ESBS’s over the last 12 months.

ESBS's Profit vs Risk Rating (31) in the null industry is in the same range as QNBC (40). This means that ESBS’s stock grew similarly to QNBC’s over the last 12 months.

QNBC's SMR Rating (50) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ESBS (88). This means that QNBC’s stock grew somewhat faster than ESBS’s over the last 12 months.

ESBS's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as QNBC (52). This means that ESBS’s stock grew similarly to QNBC’s over the last 12 months.

QNBC's P/E Growth Rating (77) in the null industry is in the same range as ESBS (95). This means that QNBC’s stock grew similarly to ESBS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ESBSQNBC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
31%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
36%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
34%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
35%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
30%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
34%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
27%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
27%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ESBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QNBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OPTHF0.150.01
+4.15%
OPTIMI HEALTH CORP.
SABK17.45N/A
N/A
South Atlantic Bancshares, Inc.
MGPUF3.70N/A
N/A
M&G PLC
IDEXF49.86-0.55
-1.09%
Industria de Diseno Textil Inditex SA
AIIXY30.20-1.08
-3.45%
Aixtron SE

ESBS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ESBS and QNBC have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ESBS and QNBC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ESBS
1D Price
Change %
ESBS100%
N/A
QNBC - ESBS
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.94%
OTPBF - ESBS
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MTRBF - ESBS
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EBKOF - ESBS
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.44%
FTFI - ESBS
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

QNBC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QNBC has been loosely correlated with FUNC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QNBC jumps, then FUNC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QNBC
1D Price
Change %
QNBC100%
+1.94%
FUNC - QNBC
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.27%
PSBQ - QNBC
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.08%
EFSC - QNBC
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.03%
ISTR - QNBC
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.69%
ORRF - QNBC
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.58%
More