Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ESCGX vs RNWBX
ESCGX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts ESCGX vs RNWBX
Ashmore Emerging Markets Equity ESG C
Price$13.09
Change-$0.16 (-1.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16.21M
American Funds New World R2
Price$90.50
Change-$0.93 (-1.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.89B
ESCGX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ESCGX vs. RNWBX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ESCGX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 74.9B vs. ESCGX (16.2M). RNWBX pays higher dividends than ESCGX: RNWBX (0.12) vs ESCGX (0.09). ESCGX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: ESCGX (6 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). ESCGX (3.14) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). ESCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 65.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than ESCGX: RNWBX (250) vs ESCGX (1000). ESCGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.91 vs. RNWBX (18.50). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 16.42 vs. ESCGX (1.26).
| ESCGX | RNWBX | ESCGX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.05 | 1.67 | 123% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.14 | 1.67 | 188% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 30.044 | 23.046 | 130% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 16.2M | 74.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.09 | 0.12 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.91 | 18.50 | 151% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.78 | 43.20 | 129% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.26 | 16.42 | 8% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 82.43 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement