Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ESCGX vs RNWBX
ESCGX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts ESCGX vs RNWBX
Ashmore Emerging Markets Equity ESG C
Price$12.74
Change+$0.09 (+0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets15.45M
American Funds New World R2
Price$89.61
Change+$0.45 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets73.72B
ESCGX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ESCGX vs. RNWBX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ESCGX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 73.7B vs. ESCGX (15.4M). RNWBX pays higher dividends than ESCGX: RNWBX (0.13) vs ESCGX (0.10). ESCGX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: ESCGX (6 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). ESCGX (3.14) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). ESCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 65.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than ESCGX: RNWBX (250) vs ESCGX (1000). ESCGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.15 vs. RNWBX (15.57). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 25.99 vs. ESCGX (12.04).
| ESCGX | RNWBX | ESCGX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.05 | 1.67 | 123% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.14 | 1.67 | 188% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.155 | 21.224 | 114% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 15.4M | 73.7B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.10 | 0.13 | 80% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.15 | 15.57 | 155% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.61 | 42.56 | 117% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.04 | 25.99 | 46% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 87.92 | - |