Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ESCGX vs RNWBX
ESCGX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts ESCGX vs RNWBX
Ashmore Emerging Markets Equity ESG C
Price$11.56
Change+$0.02 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets14.1M
American Funds New World R2
Price$85.05
Change+$0.09 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.31B
ESCGX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ESCGX vs. RNWBX commentary
Jul 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ESCGX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 70.3B vs. ESCGX (14.1M). RNWBX pays higher dividends than ESCGX: RNWBX (0.13) vs ESCGX (0.11). ESCGX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: ESCGX (5 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). ESCGX (3.14) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). ESCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 65.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than ESCGX: RNWBX (250) vs ESCGX (1000). ESCGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.30 vs. RNWBX (9.60). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 23.92 vs. ESCGX (5.45).
| ESCGX | RNWBX | ESCGX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.05 | 1.67 | 123% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.14 | 1.67 | 188% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.261 | 15.636 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 14.1M | 70.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.11 | 0.13 | 82% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.30 | 9.60 | 118% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.26 | 35.47 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.45 | 23.92 | 23% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 62.79 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement