Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ESEAX vs RGACX
ESEAX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts ESEAX vs RGACX
Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital Sel Eq A
Price$33.85
Change+$0.06 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets664.46M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$83.16
Change+$0.19 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
ESEAX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ESEAX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ESEAX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. ESEAX (664M). RGACX pays higher dividends than ESEAX: RGACX (0.07) vs ESEAX (0.00). ESEAX was incepted earlier than RGACX: ESEAX (14 years) vs RGACX (23 years). ESEAX (1.05) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. ESEAX (2.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than ESEAX: RGACX (250) vs ESEAX (1000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.83 vs. ESEAX (-2.87). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 40.02 vs. ESEAX (25.05).
| ESEAX | RGACX | ESEAX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.94 | 112% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.94 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.252 | 15.516 | -15% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 664M | 332B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.87 | 17.83 | -16% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.11 | 58.53 | 38% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.05 | 40.02 | 63% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.57 | 95.93 | 107% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement