Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ESFIX vs MEDAX
ESFIX vs MEDAX Comparison
Open Charts ESFIX vs MEDAX
Ashmore Emerging Markets Short Dur Instl
Price$4.87
Change-$0.02 (-0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets32.79M
MFS Emerging Markets Debt A
Price$12.55
Change+$0.01 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.46B
ESFIX vs MEDAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ESFIX vs. MEDAX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ESFIX is a Hold and MEDAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MEDAX has more cash in the bank: 7.46B vs. ESFIX (32.8M). MEDAX pays higher dividends than ESFIX: MEDAX (5.42) vs ESFIX (3.70). ESFIX was incepted earlier than MEDAX: ESFIX (11 years) vs MEDAX (28 years). ESFIX (1.37) is less costly to investors than MEDAX (1.07). MEDAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. ESFIX (47.00). MEDAX has a lower initial minimum investment than ESFIX: MEDAX (1000) vs ESFIX (1000000). MEDAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.04 vs. ESFIX (7.14). MEDAX return over 5 years is better than : 10.54 vs. ESFIX (-11.91).
| ESFIX | MEDAX | ESFIX / MEDAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 1.06 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 1.07 | 128% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.698 | 8.517 | 67% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 32.8M | 7.46B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.70 | 5.42 | 68% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.14 | 8.04 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.56 | 31.02 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.91 | 10.54 | -113% |
| Returns for 10 years | 9.15 | 45.74 | 20% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers