Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ESFIX vs MEDAX
ESFIX vs MEDAX Comparison
Open Charts ESFIX vs MEDAX
Ashmore Emerging Markets Short Dur Instl
Price$4.83
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets32.72M
MFS Emerging Markets Debt A
Price$12.23
Change+$0.01 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.29B
ESFIX vs MEDAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ESFIX vs. MEDAX commentary
Jul 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ESFIX is a Hold and MEDAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MEDAX has more cash in the bank: 7.29B vs. ESFIX (32.7M). MEDAX pays higher dividends than ESFIX: MEDAX (5.81) vs ESFIX (3.69). ESFIX was incepted earlier than MEDAX: ESFIX (11 years) vs MEDAX (27 years). ESFIX (1.37) is less costly to investors than MEDAX (1.07). MEDAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. ESFIX (47.00). MEDAX has a lower initial minimum investment than ESFIX: MEDAX (1000) vs ESFIX (1000000). ESFIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.66 vs. MEDAX (9.18). MEDAX return over 5 years is better than : 10.95 vs. ESFIX (-4.99).
| ESFIX | MEDAX | ESFIX / MEDAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 1.06 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 1.07 | 128% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.725 | 4.830 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 32.7M | 7.29B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.69 | 5.81 | 63% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.66 | 9.18 | 127% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.54 | 28.18 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.99 | 10.95 | -46% |
| Returns for 10 years | 6.54 | 37.58 | 17% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers