Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ESFIX vs MEDHX
ESFIX vs MEDHX Comparison
Open Charts ESFIX vs MEDHX
Ashmore Emerging Markets Short Dur Instl
Price$4.83
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets32.72M
MFS Emerging Markets Debt R6
Price$12.22
Change+$0.01 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.29B
ESFIX vs MEDHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ESFIX vs. MEDHX commentary
Jul 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ESFIX is a Hold and MEDHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MEDHX has more cash in the bank: 7.29B vs. ESFIX (32.7M). MEDHX pays higher dividends than ESFIX: MEDHX (6.16) vs ESFIX (3.69). ESFIX was incepted earlier than MEDHX: ESFIX (11 years) vs MEDHX (19 years). ESFIX (1.37) is less costly to investors than MEDHX (0.71). MEDHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. ESFIX (47.00). MEDHX has a lower initial minimum investment than ESFIX: MEDHX (0) vs ESFIX (1000000). ESFIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.66 vs. MEDHX (9.58). MEDHX return over 5 years is better than : 12.98 vs. ESFIX (-4.99).
| ESFIX | MEDHX | ESFIX / MEDHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.70 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 0.71 | 193% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.725 | 5.020 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 32.7M | 7.29B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.69 | 6.16 | 60% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.66 | 9.58 | 122% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.54 | 29.59 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.99 | 12.98 | -38% |
| Returns for 10 years | 6.54 | 42.53 | 15% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement