Ad is loading...
ESGCX vs NPFCX
ESGCX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts ESGCX vs NPFCX
Mirova Global Sustainable Equity C
Price$17.62
Change+$0.16 (+0.92%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets844.32M
American Funds New Perspective C
Price$55.75
Change+$0.86 (+1.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets132.87B
ESGCX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ESGCX vs. NPFCX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ESGCX is a Buy and NPFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 133B vs. ESGCX (844M). ESGCX pays higher dividends than NPFCX: ESGCX (0.03) vs NPFCX (0.00). ESGCX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: ESGCX (9 years) vs NPFCX (24 years). ESGCX (1.99) is less costly to investors than NPFCX (1.48). NPFCX (24.00) and ESGCX (23.00) have comparable annual turnover. NPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than ESGCX: NPFCX (250) vs ESGCX (2500). NPFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.34 vs. ESGCX (-4.17). NPFCX return over 5 years is better than : 36.91 vs. ESGCX (29.57).
| ESGCX | NPFCX | ESGCX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 1.48 | 132% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.99 | 1.48 | 134% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.631 | -5.199 | 128% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 844M | 133B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.03 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.17 | -0.34 | 1,209% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.39 | 5.46 | 227% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.57 | 36.91 | 80% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 43.74 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...