Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ESGNX vs NPFCX
ESGNX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts ESGNX vs NPFCX
Mirova Global Megatrends N
Price$21.19
Change+$0.17 (+0.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets896.18M
American Funds New Perspective C
Price$62.87
Change+$0.39 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets150.13B
ESGNX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ESGNX vs. NPFCX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ESGNX is a Buy and NPFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 150B vs. ESGNX (896M). ESGNX pays higher dividends than NPFCX: ESGNX (0.39) vs NPFCX (0.00). ESGNX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: ESGNX (8 years) vs NPFCX (24 years). NPFCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than ESGNX (0.89). NPFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. ESGNX (18.00). NPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than ESGNX: NPFCX (250) vs ESGNX (1000000). NPFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.21 vs. ESGNX (1.53). NPFCX return over 5 years is better than : 38.17 vs. ESGNX (33.27).
| ESGNX | NPFCX | ESGNX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.48 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.48 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.681 | 8.584 | 55% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 896M | 150B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.39 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.53 | 8.21 | 19% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.24 | 26.06 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.27 | 38.17 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 69.10 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement