ESHA vs GGAAF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ESHA is a StrongBuy and GGAAF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ESHA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGGAAF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- ESHA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- GGAAF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Price Growth
ESHA (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а -0.09% price change this week, while GGAAF (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was +1693.33% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +11.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.55%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.57%.
Reported Earning Dates
ESHA is expected to report earnings on Apr 04, 2025.
GGAAF is expected to report earnings on Nov 17, 2022.
Industries' Descriptions
@Financial Conglomerates (+11.19% weekly)Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.
| ESHA | GGAAF | ESHA / GGAAF | |
| Capitalization | 152M | 69.1M | 220% |
| EBITDA | -391.76K | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.064 | -15.674 | -20% |
| P/E Ratio | 167.28 | 135.14 | 124% |
| Revenue | 0 | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | 1.97M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | N/A | - |
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
ESHA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ESHA has been loosely correlated with ASPC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ESHA jumps, then ASPC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ESHA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESHA | 100% | N/A | ||
| ASPC - ESHA | 38% Loosely correlated | -0.10% | ||
| IPXXU - ESHA | 24% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| FGMC - ESHA | 23% Poorly correlated | -0.10% | ||
| CSLMF - ESHA | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| FORLU - ESHA | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
GGAAF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that GGAAF and ACBD have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GGAAF and ACBD's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GGAAF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GGAAF | 100% | N/A | ||
| ACBD - GGAAF | 24% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| HYAC - GGAAF | 24% Poorly correlated | +0.28% | ||
| ADMG - GGAAF | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| NETD - GGAAF | 8% Poorly correlated | -0.09% | ||
| ESHA - GGAAF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||