ESHA
Price
$11.12
Change
+$0.13 (+1.18%)
Updated
Jun 30, 01:47 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
151.76M
GGAAF
Price
$5.38
Change
+$5.08 (+1693.33%)
Updated
Apr 23 closing price
Capitalization
69.14M
Interact to see
Advertisement

ESHA vs GGAAF

Header iconESHA vs GGAAF Comparison
Open Charts ESHA vs GGAAFBanner chart's image
ESH Acquisition
Price$11.12
Change+$0.13 (+1.18%)
VolumeN/A
Capitalization151.76M
Genesis Growth Tech Acquisition
Price$5.38
Change+$5.08 (+1693.33%)
Volume$282
Capitalization69.14M
ESHA vs GGAAF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ESHA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ESHA vs. GGAAF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ESHA is a Hold and GGAAF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (ESHA: $10.99 vs. GGAAF: $5.38)
Brand notoriety: ESHA and GGAAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ESHA: 9% vs. GGAAF: 100%
Market capitalization -- ESHA: $151.76M vs. GGAAF: $69.14M
ESHA [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $151.76M. GGAAF’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $69.14M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $4.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ESHA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGGAAF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ESHA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GGAAF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both ESHA and GGAAF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ESHA’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • ESHA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 0 bearish.

Price Growth

ESHA (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while GGAAF (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -1.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.69%.

Reported Earning Dates

ESHA is expected to report earnings on May 20, 2025.

GGAAF is expected to report earnings on Nov 17, 2022.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (-1.49% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ESHA($152M) has a higher market cap than GGAAF($69.1M). ESHA has higher P/E ratio than GGAAF: ESHA (167.28) vs GGAAF (135.14). ESHA YTD gains are higher at: 2.043 vs. GGAAF (-15.674).
ESHAGGAAFESHA / GGAAF
Capitalization152M69.1M220%
EBITDA-391.76KN/A-
Gain YTD2.043-15.674-13%
P/E Ratio167.28135.14124%
Revenue0N/A-
Total Cash1.97MN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ESHAGGAAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
25%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
10%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
15%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
11%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
27%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
11%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
27%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ESHA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BBBK40.00N/A
N/A
Baker Boyer Bancorp
BIOVF29.25N/A
N/A
Swedish Orphan Biovitrum AB
DPZUF12.40N/A
N/A
Domino's Pizza Australia New Zealand
ELNX0.06N/A
N/A
Elinx Corp.
SVNDY15.80-0.13
-0.79%
Seven & I Holdings Co., Ltd.

ESHA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ESHA has been loosely correlated with ASPC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ESHA jumps, then ASPC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ESHA
1D Price
Change %
ESHA100%
N/A
ASPC - ESHA
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.20%
FGMC - ESHA
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.10%
CSLMF - ESHA
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FORLU - ESHA
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BOWN - ESHA
14%
Poorly correlated
-0.98%
More

GGAAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GGAAF and ACBD have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GGAAF and ACBD's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GGAAF
1D Price
Change %
GGAAF100%
N/A
ACBD - GGAAF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HYAC - GGAAF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.18%
NETD - GGAAF
8%
Poorly correlated
-0.18%
ESHA - GGAAF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BOWN - GGAAF
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.98%
More