ESHA
Price
$10.77
Change
-$0.47 (-4.18%)
Updated
Jan 13 closing price
Capitalization
151.76M
RMHI
Price
$1.92
Change
+$0.02 (+1.05%)
Updated
Jan 16 closing price
Capitalization
1.47M
Ad is loading...

ESHA vs RMHI

Header iconESHA vs RMHI Comparison
Open Charts ESHA vs RMHIBanner chart's image
ESH Acquisition
Price$10.77
Change-$0.47 (-4.18%)
Volume$1.52K
Capitalization151.76M
Retrieve Medical Holdings
Price$1.92
Change+$0.02 (+1.05%)
Volume$1.36K
Capitalization1.47M
ESHA vs RMHI Comparison Chart
Loading...
ESHA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RMHI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ESHA vs. RMHI commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ESHA is a Hold and RMHI is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (ESHA: $10.77 vs. RMHI: $1.92)
Brand notoriety: ESHA and RMHI are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ESHA: 8% vs. RMHI: 50%
Market capitalization -- ESHA: $151.76M vs. RMHI: $1.47M
ESHA [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $151.76M. RMHI’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $1.47M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $3.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ESHA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRMHI’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ESHA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RMHI’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, RMHI is a better buy in the long-term than ESHA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ESHA’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RMHI’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ESHA’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • RMHI’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RMHI is a better buy in the short-term than ESHA.

Price Growth

ESHA (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а -4.18% price change this week, while RMHI (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was +28.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -0.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was +28.80%.

Reported Earning Dates

RMHI is expected to report earnings on Feb 16, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (-0.19% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ESHA($152M) has a higher market cap than RMHI($1.47M). RMHI YTD gains are higher at: 79.439 vs. ESHA (0.000).
ESHARMHIESHA / RMHI
Capitalization152M1.47M10,347%
EBITDA-391.76KN/A-
Gain YTD0.00079.439-
P/E Ratio167.28N/A-
Revenue0N/A-
Total Cash1.97MN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RMHI: Fundamental Ratings
RMHI
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
37
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
36
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ESHARMHI
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
11%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
2%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
3%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 28 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
88%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
ESHA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RMHI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NLCCX32.750.40
+1.24%
Voya Large-Cap Growth C
FSCRX25.240.09
+0.36%
Fidelity Small Cap Discovery
JMVSX36.960.10
+0.27%
JPMorgan Mid Cap Value I
ICEWX37.810.03
+0.08%
NYLI Epoch International Choice Class C
DAREX14.180.01
+0.07%
Dunham Real Estate Stock A

ESHA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ESHA has been loosely correlated with LATGU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ESHA jumps, then LATGU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ESHA
1D Price
Change %
ESHA100%
N/A
LATGU - ESHA
59%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ASPC - ESHA
44%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BOWN - ESHA
31%
Poorly correlated
+14.84%
IPXXU - ESHA
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LATG - ESHA
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

RMHI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RMHI and MTLK have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RMHI and MTLK's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RMHI
1D Price
Change %
RMHI100%
N/A
MTLK - RMHI
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RENI - RMHI
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CITE - RMHI
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ESHA - RMHI
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GODN - RMHI
6%
Poorly correlated
+3.00%
More