ESLOF
Price
$288.30
Change
+$1.30 (+0.45%)
Updated
Apr 23 closing price
Capitalization
90.98B
SAUHF
Price
$119.60
Change
+$4.09 (+3.54%)
Updated
Apr 23 closing price
Capitalization
21.5B
Ad is loading...

ESLOF vs SAUHF

Header iconESLOF vs SAUHF Comparison
Open Charts ESLOF vs SAUHFBanner chart's image
EssilorLuxottica
Price$288.30
Change+$1.30 (+0.45%)
Volume$824
Capitalization90.98B
Straumann Holding AG
Price$119.60
Change+$4.09 (+3.54%)
Volume$152
Capitalization21.5B
ESLOF vs SAUHF Comparison Chart
Loading...
ESLOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SAUHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ESLOF vs. SAUHF commentary
Apr 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ESLOF is a StrongBuy and SAUHF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 24, 2025
Stock price -- (ESLOF: $288.30 vs. SAUHF: $119.60)
Brand notoriety: ESLOF and SAUHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Medical Specialties industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ESLOF: 109% vs. SAUHF: 29%
Market capitalization -- ESLOF: $90.98B vs. SAUHF: $21.5B
ESLOF [@Medical Specialties] is valued at $90.98B. SAUHF’s [@Medical Specialties] market capitalization is $21.5B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical Specialties] industry ranges from $3.82T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical Specialties] industry is $8.31B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ESLOF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSAUHF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ESLOF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • SAUHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ESLOF is a better buy in the long-term than SAUHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ESLOF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SAUHF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ESLOF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SAUHF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SAUHF is a better buy in the short-term than ESLOF.

Price Growth

ESLOF (@Medical Specialties) experienced а +3.43% price change this week, while SAUHF (@Medical Specialties) price change was +1.84% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical Specialties industry was +3.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.45%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.85%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Medical Specialties (+3.05% weekly)

Medical specialties are companies that make equipment used by the health care industry. Equipment manufactured and distributed by these companies include dialysis machines, blood analysis equipment, surgical equipment, dental instruments, and diagnostic tools, among other items. Large companies typically aim to produce and distribute high-quality products across a broad market spectrum. Smaller firms are more likely to specialize in a particular market segment. Due to the industry’s close association with medical treatments, they typically have low sensitivity to macroeconomic fluctuations. Within this industry, Abbott Laboratories, Medtronic Plc and Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. are some of the companies with multi-billion market capitalizations in the U.S. stock markets.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ESLOF($91B) has a higher market cap than SAUHF($21.5B). SAUHF has higher P/E ratio than ESLOF: SAUHF (51.55) vs ESLOF (34.48). ESLOF YTD gains are higher at: 20.000 vs. SAUHF (-2.380). ESLOF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.23B vs. SAUHF (601M). ESLOF has more cash in the bank: 1.69B vs. SAUHF (726M). SAUHF has less debt than ESLOF: SAUHF (722M) vs ESLOF (11.7B). ESLOF has higher revenues than SAUHF: ESLOF (25.4B) vs SAUHF (1.81B).
ESLOFSAUHFESLOF / SAUHF
Capitalization91B21.5B423%
EBITDA6.23B601M1,037%
Gain YTD20.000-2.380-840%
P/E Ratio34.4851.5567%
Revenue25.4B1.81B1,406%
Total Cash1.69B726M233%
Total Debt11.7B722M1,620%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ESLOF vs SAUHF: Fundamental Ratings
ESLOF
SAUHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5869
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
14
Undervalued
17
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1593
SMR RATING
1..100
9781
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4380
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2196
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ESLOF's Valuation (14) in the null industry is in the same range as SAUHF (17). This means that ESLOF’s stock grew similarly to SAUHF’s over the last 12 months.

ESLOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SAUHF (93). This means that ESLOF’s stock grew significantly faster than SAUHF’s over the last 12 months.

SAUHF's SMR Rating (81) in the null industry is in the same range as ESLOF (97). This means that SAUHF’s stock grew similarly to ESLOF’s over the last 12 months.

ESLOF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SAUHF (80). This means that ESLOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SAUHF’s over the last 12 months.

ESLOF's P/E Growth Rating (21) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SAUHF (96). This means that ESLOF’s stock grew significantly faster than SAUHF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ESLOFSAUHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
ESLOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SAUHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MSTB33.280.34
+1.04%
LHA Market State Tactical Beta ETF
CTBB16.230.13
+0.81%
Qwest Corp
BALT31.200.11
+0.35%
Innovator Defined Wealth Shld ETF
CEMB44.330.08
+0.18%
iShares JP Morgan EM Corporate Bond ETF
DIVS28.51N/A
+0.01%
SmartETFs Dividend Builder ETF

ESLOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ESLOF has been loosely correlated with ESLOY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ESLOF jumps, then ESLOY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ESLOF
1D Price
Change %
ESLOF100%
+0.45%
ESLOY - ESLOF
58%
Loosely correlated
-1.26%
SAUHF - ESLOF
39%
Loosely correlated
+3.54%
SMMNY - ESLOF
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.27%
NVCR - ESLOF
27%
Poorly correlated
+7.63%
MASS - ESLOF
24%
Poorly correlated
-4.42%
More

SAUHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SAUHF has been loosely correlated with SAUHY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SAUHF jumps, then SAUHY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SAUHF
1D Price
Change %
SAUHF100%
+3.54%
SAUHY - SAUHF
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.49%
ESLOF - SAUHF
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.45%
LZAGF - SAUHF
31%
Poorly correlated
+4.43%
SNN - SAUHF
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.38%
SGHT - SAUHF
25%
Poorly correlated
+7.36%
More