Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ESPO vs FDCF
ESPO vs FDCF Comparison
Open Charts ESPO vs FDCF
VanEck Vdo Gaming and eSprts ETF
Price$110.00
Change+$0.68 (+0.62%)
Volume$500
Net Assets386.79M
Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF
Price$45.20
Change-$0.06 (-0.13%)
Volume$442
Net Assets79.91M
ESPO vs FDCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ESPO vs. FDCF commentary
Aug 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ESPO is a Hold and FDCF is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ESPO has more net assets: 387M vs. FDCF (79.9M). ESPO has a higher annual dividend yield than FDCF: ESPO (31.106) vs FDCF (19.854). ESPO was incepted earlier than FDCF: ESPO (7 years) vs FDCF (5 years). FDCF (0.50) has a lower expense ratio than ESPO (0.56). ESPO (36.00) and FDCF (35.00) have matching turnover.
| ESPO | FDCF | ESPO / FDCF | |
| Gain YTD | 31.106 | 19.854 | 157% |
| Net Assets | 387M | 79.9M | 484% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.50 | 112% |
| Turnover | 36.00 | 35.00 | 103% |
| Yield | 0.34 | 0.04 | 963% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 5 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| ESPO | FDCF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 81% | 1 day ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 68% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 88% | 13 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 81% | 15 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 79% | 1 day ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
ESPO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ESPO has been loosely correlated with APP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ESPO jumps, then APP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ESPO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESPO | 100% | +2.99% | ||
| APP - ESPO | 66% Loosely correlated | +4.18% | ||
| NVDA - ESPO | 62% Loosely correlated | +3.62% | ||
| AMD - ESPO | 57% Loosely correlated | +3.00% | ||
| U - ESPO | 56% Loosely correlated | +6.85% | ||
| RBLX - ESPO | 53% Loosely correlated | +4.53% | ||
More | ||||
FDCF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDCF has been closely correlated with TSM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FDCF jumps, then TSM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDCF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDCF | 100% | +2.07% | ||
| TSM - FDCF | 74% Closely correlated | +1.61% | ||
| ANET - FDCF | 74% Closely correlated | +2.40% | ||
| META - FDCF | 73% Closely correlated | +3.51% | ||
| CDNS - FDCF | 68% Closely correlated | +2.22% | ||
| AMZN - FDCF | 68% Closely correlated | -1.44% | ||
More | ||||