Ad is loading...
ESPO vs FDCF
ESPO vs FDCF Comparison
Open Charts ESPO vs FDCF
VanEck Vdo Gaming and eSprts ETF
Price$83.95
Change+$0.44 (+0.53%)
Volume$118
Net Assets279.5M
Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF
Price$38.98
Change+$0.35 (+0.91%)
Volume$14.16K
Net Assets58.03M
ESPO vs FDCF Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ESPO vs. FDCF commentary
Jan 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ESPO is a Hold and FDCF is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ESPO has more net assets: 280M vs. FDCF (58M). FDCF has a higher annual dividend yield than ESPO: FDCF (3.200) vs ESPO (0.684). ESPO was incepted earlier than FDCF: ESPO (6 years) vs FDCF (5 years). ESPO has a higher turnover FDCF (17.00) vs FDCF (17.00).
| ESPO | FDCF | ESPO / FDCF | |
| Gain YTD | 0.684 | 3.200 | 21% |
| Net Assets | 280M | 58M | 483% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 30.00 | 17.00 | 176% |
| Yield | 0.87 | 0.00 | - |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 5 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| ESPO | FDCF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 80% | 11 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 84% | 11 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 81% | 11 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 79% | 11 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 90% | 13 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 80% | 11 days ago 66% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
ESPO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ESPO has been loosely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ESPO jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ESPO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESPO | 100% | +0.53% | ||
| NVDA - ESPO | 62% Loosely correlated | +3.10% | ||
| AMD - ESPO | 57% Loosely correlated | +2.55% | ||
| APP - ESPO | 56% Loosely correlated | +3.11% | ||
| U - ESPO | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.09% | ||
| SF - ESPO | 51% Loosely correlated | +1.82% | ||
More | ||||
FDCF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDCF has been closely correlated with TSM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FDCF jumps, then TSM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDCF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDCF | 100% | +0.91% | ||
| TSM - FDCF | 68% Closely correlated | -1.53% | ||
| CDNS - FDCF | 68% Closely correlated | +2.24% | ||
| AMZN - FDCF | 68% Closely correlated | +2.39% | ||
| ANET - FDCF | 66% Closely correlated | +1.54% | ||
| SNPS - FDCF | 65% Loosely correlated | +2.11% | ||
More | ||||