Ad is loading...
ESPO vs FDCF
ESPO vs FDCF Comparison
Open Charts ESPO vs FDCF
VanEck Vdo Gaming and eSprts ETF
Price$84.06
Change-$2.67 (-3.08%)
Volume$150
CapitalizationN/A
Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF
Price$38.64
Change-$0.46 (-1.18%)
Volume$2K
CapitalizationN/A
ESPO vs FDCF Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ESPO vs. FDCF commentary
Dec 19, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ESPO is a Hold and FDCF is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ESPO has more net assets: 289M vs. FDCF (59.4M). ESPO has a higher annual dividend yield than FDCF: ESPO (52.882) vs FDCF (32.650). ESPO was incepted earlier than FDCF: ESPO (6 years) vs FDCF (5 years). ESPO has a higher turnover FDCF (17.00) vs FDCF (17.00).
| ESPO | FDCF | ESPO / FDCF | |
| Gain YTD | 52.882 | 32.650 | 162% |
| Net Assets | 289M | 59.4M | 487% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 30.00 | 17.00 | 176% |
| Yield | 0.87 | 0.00 | - |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 5 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| ESPO | FDCF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 54% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 15 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 80% | 6 days ago 67% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 78% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
ESPO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ESPO has been loosely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ESPO jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ESPO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESPO | 100% | +0.84% | ||
| NVDA - ESPO | 62% Loosely correlated | -1.22% | ||
| AMD - ESPO | 57% Loosely correlated | -1.32% | ||
| APP - ESPO | 53% Loosely correlated | -1.76% | ||
| U - ESPO | 52% Loosely correlated | -1.99% | ||
| SF - ESPO | 51% Loosely correlated | -2.08% | ||
More | ||||
FDCF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDCF has been closely correlated with TSM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FDCF jumps, then TSM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDCF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDCF | 100% | -0.77% | ||
| TSM - FDCF | 68% Closely correlated | -0.77% | ||
| CDNS - FDCF | 68% Closely correlated | -0.68% | ||
| AMZN - FDCF | 68% Closely correlated | -0.76% | ||
| ANET - FDCF | 66% Closely correlated | -3.07% | ||
| SNPS - FDCF | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.96% | ||
More | ||||