Ad is loading...
ESPO vs FDCF
ESPO vs FDCF Comparison
Open Charts ESPO vs FDCF
VanEck Vdo Gaming and eSprts ETF
Price$85.44
Change+$5.53 (+6.92%)
Volume$2.44K
Net Assets276.54M
Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF
Price$35.75
Change+$3.37 (+10.41%)
Volume$800
Net Assets55.36M
ESPO vs FDCF Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ESPO vs. FDCF commentary
Apr 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ESPO is a Hold and FDCF is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ESPO has more net assets: 277M vs. FDCF (55.4M). ESPO has a higher annual dividend yield than FDCF: ESPO (-4.162) vs FDCF (-14.274). ESPO was incepted earlier than FDCF: ESPO (6 years) vs FDCF (5 years). FDCF (0.50) has a lower expense ratio than ESPO (0.56). FDCF has a higher turnover ESPO (30.00) vs ESPO (30.00).
| ESPO | FDCF | ESPO / FDCF | |
| Gain YTD | -4.162 | -14.274 | 29% |
| Net Assets | 277M | 55.4M | 500% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.50 | 112% |
| Turnover | 30.00 | 35.00 | 86% |
| Yield | 0.42 | 0.07 | 597% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 5 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| ESPO | FDCF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 63% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 90% | 8 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 65% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
ESPO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ESPO has been loosely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ESPO jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ESPO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESPO | 100% | -0.34% | ||
| NVDA - ESPO | 62% Loosely correlated | -1.37% | ||
| APP - ESPO | 61% Loosely correlated | +1.32% | ||
| AMD - ESPO | 57% Loosely correlated | -6.49% | ||
| U - ESPO | 54% Loosely correlated | -2.90% | ||
| SF - ESPO | 51% Loosely correlated | -2.57% | ||
More | ||||
FDCF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDCF has been closely correlated with TSM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FDCF jumps, then TSM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDCF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDCF | 100% | -1.82% | ||
| TSM - FDCF | 68% Closely correlated | -3.70% | ||
| CDNS - FDCF | 68% Closely correlated | -0.93% | ||
| AMZN - FDCF | 68% Closely correlated | -2.62% | ||
| ANET - FDCF | 66% Closely correlated | +1.95% | ||
| SNPS - FDCF | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.18% | ||
More | ||||