Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ESPO vs FDCF
ESPO vs FDCF Comparison
Open Charts ESPO vs FDCF
VanEck Vdo Gaming and eSprts ETF
Price$119.61
Change-$1.37 (-1.13%)
Volume$71.01K
Net Assets526.87M
Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF
Price$49.11
Change-$0.47 (-0.95%)
Volume$17.65K
Net Assets104.35M
ESPO vs FDCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ESPO vs. FDCF commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ESPO is a Hold and FDCF is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ESPO has more net assets: 527M vs. FDCF (104M). ESPO has a higher annual dividend yield than FDCF: ESPO (43.452) vs FDCF (30.069). ESPO was incepted earlier than FDCF: ESPO (7 years) vs FDCF (5 years). FDCF (0.50) has a lower expense ratio than ESPO (0.56). ESPO has a higher turnover FDCF (23.00) vs FDCF (23.00).
| ESPO | FDCF | ESPO / FDCF | |
| Gain YTD | 43.452 | 30.069 | 145% |
| Net Assets | 527M | 104M | 507% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.50 | 112% |
| Turnover | 36.00 | 23.00 | 157% |
| Yield | 0.30 | 0.03 | 929% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 5 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| ESPO | FDCF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 79% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 76% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 75% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 88% | 9 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 7 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
ESPO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ESPO has been loosely correlated with APP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ESPO jumps, then APP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ESPO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESPO | 100% | -1.13% | ||
| APP - ESPO | 65% Loosely correlated | +7.64% | ||
| NVDA - ESPO | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.27% | ||
| U - ESPO | 53% Loosely correlated | -3.01% | ||
| AMD - ESPO | 52% Loosely correlated | +3.83% | ||
| SF - ESPO | 51% Loosely correlated | -2.00% | ||
More | ||||
FDCF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDCF has been closely correlated with META. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FDCF jumps, then META could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDCF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDCF | 100% | -0.94% | ||
| META - FDCF | 74% Closely correlated | -0.36% | ||
| NVDA - FDCF | 73% Closely correlated | -0.27% | ||
| AMZN - FDCF | 72% Closely correlated | +0.40% | ||
| NET - FDCF | 70% Closely correlated | -1.65% | ||
| ANET - FDCF | 70% Closely correlated | -2.82% | ||
More | ||||