Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ESPO vs FDCF
ESPO vs FDCF Comparison
Open Charts ESPO vs FDCF
VanEck Vdo Gaming and eSprts ETF
Price$105.26
Change+$0.98 (+0.94%)
Volume$750
Net Assets370.53M
Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF
Price$42.12
Change+$0.50 (+1.20%)
Volume$100
Net Assets71.08M
ESPO vs FDCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ESPO vs. FDCF commentary
Jun 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ESPO is a Hold and FDCF is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ESPO has more net assets: 371M vs. FDCF (71.1M). ESPO has a higher annual dividend yield than FDCF: ESPO (25.066) vs FDCF (10.496). ESPO was incepted earlier than FDCF: ESPO (7 years) vs FDCF (5 years). FDCF (0.50) has a lower expense ratio than ESPO (0.56). ESPO (36.00) and FDCF (35.00) have matching turnover.
| ESPO | FDCF | ESPO / FDCF | |
| Gain YTD | 25.066 | 10.496 | 239% |
| Net Assets | 371M | 71.1M | 522% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.50 | 112% |
| Turnover | 36.00 | 35.00 | 103% |
| Yield | 0.36 | 0.06 | 561% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 5 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| ESPO | FDCF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 87% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 4 days ago 88% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 72% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 89% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 28 days ago 89% | 19 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 25 days ago 81% | 11 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
ESPO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ESPO has been loosely correlated with APP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ESPO jumps, then APP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ESPO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESPO | 100% | -1.50% | ||
| APP - ESPO | 65% Loosely correlated | -5.71% | ||
| NVDA - ESPO | 62% Loosely correlated | -1.12% | ||
| U - ESPO | 57% Loosely correlated | -3.51% | ||
| AMD - ESPO | 57% Loosely correlated | +1.14% | ||
| RBLX - ESPO | 53% Loosely correlated | -0.55% | ||
More | ||||
FDCF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDCF has been closely correlated with TSM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FDCF jumps, then TSM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDCF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDCF | 100% | -0.34% | ||
| TSM - FDCF | 68% Closely correlated | +0.87% | ||
| CDNS - FDCF | 68% Closely correlated | -0.49% | ||
| AMZN - FDCF | 68% Closely correlated | -1.33% | ||
| ANET - FDCF | 66% Closely correlated | -4.42% | ||
| SNPS - FDCF | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.65% | ||
More | ||||