Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ESPO vs FDCF
ESPO vs FDCF Comparison
Open Charts ESPO vs FDCF
VanEck Vdo Gaming and eSprts ETF
Price$105.08
Change+$0.60 (+0.57%)
Volume$100
Net Assets380.93M
Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF
Price$44.03
Change+$0.27 (+0.62%)
Volume$500
Net Assets74.58M
ESPO vs FDCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ESPO vs. FDCF commentary
Jul 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ESPO is a Hold and FDCF is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ESPO has more net assets: 381M vs. FDCF (74.6M). ESPO has a higher annual dividend yield than FDCF: ESPO (25.306) vs FDCF (15.912). ESPO was incepted earlier than FDCF: ESPO (7 years) vs FDCF (5 years). FDCF (0.50) has a lower expense ratio than ESPO (0.56). ESPO (36.00) and FDCF (35.00) have matching turnover.
| ESPO | FDCF | ESPO / FDCF | |
| Gain YTD | 25.306 | 15.912 | 159% |
| Net Assets | 381M | 74.6M | 511% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.50 | 112% |
| Turnover | 36.00 | 35.00 | 103% |
| Yield | 0.33 | 0.04 | 926% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 5 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| ESPO | FDCF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 79% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 88% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 89% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 89% | 12 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FSIRX | 8.66 | 0.02 | +0.19% |
| Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Ret I | |||
| RGELX | 11.48 | -0.04 | -0.35% |
| RBC Global Equity Leaders A | |||
| BROCX | 21.32 | -0.19 | -0.88% |
| BlackRock Advantage International Inv C | |||
| AFCGX | 19.17 | -0.17 | -0.88% |
| American Century Focused Intl Gr G | |||
| CCWIX | 21.14 | -0.19 | -0.89% |
| Baird Chautauqua International Gr Instl | |||
ESPO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ESPO has been loosely correlated with APP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ESPO jumps, then APP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ESPO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESPO | 100% | -0.70% | ||
| APP - ESPO | 65% Loosely correlated | -3.24% | ||
| NVDA - ESPO | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.50% | ||
| AMD - ESPO | 57% Loosely correlated | +1.57% | ||
| U - ESPO | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.79% | ||
| RBLX - ESPO | 52% Loosely correlated | +0.63% | ||
More | ||||
FDCF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDCF has been closely correlated with TSM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FDCF jumps, then TSM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDCF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDCF | 100% | -0.67% | ||
| TSM - FDCF | 68% Closely correlated | +0.28% | ||
| CDNS - FDCF | 68% Closely correlated | -0.64% | ||
| AMZN - FDCF | 68% Closely correlated | +1.11% | ||
| ANET - FDCF | 66% Closely correlated | +2.15% | ||
| SNPS - FDCF | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.22% | ||
More | ||||