ESQ vs FDVA
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ESQ is a Hold and FDVA is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ESQ’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileFDVA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- ESQ’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- FDVA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ESQ’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FDVA’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ESQ’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
- FDVA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
ESQ (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.60% price change this week, while FDVA (@Regional Banks) price change was -3.18% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -3.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.80%.
Reported Earning Dates
ESQ is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2025.
FDVA is expected to report earnings on Jan 24, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Regional Banks (-3.34% weekly)Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
| ESQ | FDVA | ESQ / FDVA | |
| Capitalization | 393M | 81.2M | 484% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 57.344 | 2.207 | 2,598% |
| P/E Ratio | 9.71 | 9.64 | 101% |
| Revenue | 110M | 35.7M | 308% |
| Total Cash | 614K | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 49K | 47.6M | 0% |
ESQ | FDVA | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 80 | 4 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 97 Overvalued | 47 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 4 | 85 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 23 | 78 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | 54 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 15 | 14 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 27 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FDVA's Valuation (47) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ESQ (97) in the Major Banks industry. This means that FDVA’s stock grew somewhat faster than ESQ’s over the last 12 months.
ESQ's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the Major Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for FDVA (85) in the null industry. This means that ESQ’s stock grew significantly faster than FDVA’s over the last 12 months.
ESQ's SMR Rating (23) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FDVA (78) in the null industry. This means that ESQ’s stock grew somewhat faster than FDVA’s over the last 12 months.
ESQ's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as FDVA (54) in the null industry. This means that ESQ’s stock grew similarly to FDVA’s over the last 12 months.
FDVA's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the null industry is in the same range as ESQ (15) in the Major Banks industry. This means that FDVA’s stock grew similarly to ESQ’s over the last 12 months.
| ESQ | FDVA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 55% | 3 days ago 26% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% | 3 days ago 37% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 57% | 3 days ago 47% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 47% | 3 days ago 22% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 55% | 3 days ago 25% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 25% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 76% | 11 days ago 45% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 56% | 4 days ago 44% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 60% | 3 days ago 23% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 52% |
ESQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ESQ has been closely correlated with THFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ESQ jumps, then THFF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ESQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESQ | 100% | -1.28% | ||
| THFF - ESQ | 75% Closely correlated | -2.86% | ||
| CHCO - ESQ | 74% Closely correlated | -1.66% | ||
| UVSP - ESQ | 74% Closely correlated | -2.90% | ||
| FFIN - ESQ | 73% Closely correlated | -4.06% | ||
| TRST - ESQ | 73% Closely correlated | -4.26% | ||
More | ||||
FDVA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that FDVA and GPFOF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FDVA and GPFOF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDVA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDVA | 100% | N/A | ||
| GPFOF - FDVA | 30% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| FNRN - FDVA | 28% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CBWA - FDVA | 24% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ISTR - FDVA | 22% Poorly correlated | -1.03% | ||
| ESQ - FDVA | 22% Poorly correlated | -1.28% | ||
More | ||||