It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ESQ’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileLKFN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ESQ’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LKFN’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
ESQ (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.87% price change this week, while LKFN (@Regional Banks) price change was -5.33% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -2.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.15%.
ESQ is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2025.
LKFN is expected to report earnings on Jan 23, 2025.
Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
ESQ | LKFN | ESQ / LKFN | |
Capitalization | 393M | 1.72B | 23% |
EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | 59.085 | 8.870 | 666% |
P/E Ratio | 9.71 | 17.66 | 55% |
Revenue | 110M | 247M | 45% |
Total Cash | 614K | 75.1M | 1% |
Total Debt | 49K | 50M | 0% |
ESQ | LKFN | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 98 Overvalued | 99 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 4 | 42 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 24 | 18 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 37 | 50 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 14 | 52 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ESQ's Valuation (98) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as LKFN (99) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that ESQ’s stock grew similarly to LKFN’s over the last 12 months.
ESQ's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LKFN (42) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that ESQ’s stock grew somewhat faster than LKFN’s over the last 12 months.
LKFN's SMR Rating (18) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as ESQ (24) in the Major Banks industry. This means that LKFN’s stock grew similarly to ESQ’s over the last 12 months.
ESQ's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as LKFN (50) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that ESQ’s stock grew similarly to LKFN’s over the last 12 months.
ESQ's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LKFN (52) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that ESQ’s stock grew somewhat faster than LKFN’s over the last 12 months.
ESQ | LKFN | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago70% | 4 days ago67% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago57% | 4 days ago71% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago84% | 4 days ago64% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago53% | 4 days ago70% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago79% | 4 days ago64% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago80% | 4 days ago65% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 19 days ago76% | 13 days ago61% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 15 days ago56% | 5 days ago62% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago58% | 4 days ago62% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago80% | 4 days ago62% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
SCREX | 35.64 | 0.57 | +1.63% |
Sterling Capital Rl Estt R6 | |||
MOTBX | 19.52 | 0.18 | +0.93% |
NYLI WMC Small Companies Class B | |||
GHTMX | 12.31 | -0.03 | -0.24% |
Goldman Sachs International T/M Eq Instl | |||
TWIEX | 12.29 | -0.06 | -0.49% |
American Century International Gr Inv | |||
GFBLX | 36.70 | -1.15 | -3.04% |
American Funds Global Balanced F3 |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ESQ has been closely correlated with THFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ESQ jumps, then THFF could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ESQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ESQ | 100% | +1.43% | ||
THFF - ESQ | 74% Closely correlated | +1.37% | ||
UVSP - ESQ | 72% Closely correlated | +0.30% | ||
CHCO - ESQ | 71% Closely correlated | +0.91% | ||
FFIN - ESQ | 71% Closely correlated | +1.31% | ||
LKFN - ESQ | 71% Closely correlated | +0.91% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LKFN has been closely correlated with THFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LKFN jumps, then THFF could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LKFN | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
LKFN | 100% | +0.91% | ||
THFF - LKFN | 85% Closely correlated | +1.37% | ||
BUSE - LKFN | 85% Closely correlated | +0.33% | ||
SYBT - LKFN | 85% Closely correlated | +0.76% | ||
NWBI - LKFN | 84% Closely correlated | +1.37% | ||
PFC - LKFN | 84% Closely correlated | +1.79% | ||
More |