ESVIF
Price
$1.64
Change
-$0.01 (-0.61%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
346.9M
NE
Price
$28.33
Change
-$0.37 (-1.29%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
6.82B
9 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ESVIF vs NE

Header iconESVIF vs NE Comparison
Open Charts ESVIF vs NEBanner chart's image
Ensign Energy Services
Price$1.64
Change-$0.01 (-0.61%)
Volume$11.84K
Capitalization346.9M
Noble
Price$28.33
Change-$0.37 (-1.29%)
Volume$1.05M
Capitalization6.82B
ESVIF vs NE Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ESVIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ESVIF vs. NE commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ESVIF is a Hold and NE is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (ESVIF: $1.64 vs. NE: $28.33)
Brand notoriety: ESVIF and NE are both not notable
Both companies represent the Contract Drilling industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ESVIF: 39% vs. NE: 48%
Market capitalization -- ESVIF: $346.9M vs. NE: $6.82B
ESVIF [@Contract Drilling] is valued at $346.9M. NE’s [@Contract Drilling] market capitalization is $6.82B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Contract Drilling] industry ranges from $6.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Contract Drilling] industry is $1.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ESVIF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNE’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ESVIF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NE’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, NE is a better buy in the long-term than ESVIF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ESVIF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NE’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ESVIF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • NE’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NE is a better buy in the short-term than ESVIF.

Price Growth

ESVIF (@Contract Drilling) experienced а -1.20% price change this week, while NE (@Contract Drilling) price change was +4.93% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Contract Drilling industry was +3.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was -11.81%.

Reported Earning Dates

ESVIF is expected to report earnings on May 12, 2025.

NE is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Contract Drilling (+3.38% weekly)

The contract drilling industry includes companies that provide onshore and offshore drilling services to the energy sector. Services are delivered on a contractual or per-fee basis. Customers of this industry include major and independent oil and gas companies. Strong oil demand could potentially boost contract fees. Helmerich & Payne, Inc., Transocean Ltd and Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. are among the major drilling companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NE($6.82B) has a higher market cap than ESVIF($347M). ESVIF has higher P/E ratio than NE: ESVIF (94.34) vs NE (14.39). NE YTD gains are higher at: -6.035 vs. ESVIF (-20.388). NE has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 766M vs. ESVIF (424M). NE has more cash in the bank: 361M vs. ESVIF (44.8M). NE has less debt than ESVIF: NE (586M) vs ESVIF (1.42B). NE has higher revenues than ESVIF: NE (2.59B) vs ESVIF (1.73B).
ESVIFNEESVIF / NE
Capitalization347M6.82B5%
EBITDA424M766M55%
Gain YTD-20.388-6.035338%
P/E Ratio94.3414.39656%
Revenue1.73B2.59B67%
Total Cash44.8M361M12%
Total Debt1.42B586M242%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ESVIF vs NE: Fundamental Ratings
ESVIF
NE
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6612
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
51
Fair valued
17
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7346
SMR RATING
1..100
9065
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6053
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3390
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NE's Valuation (17) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ESVIF (51). This means that NE’s stock grew somewhat faster than ESVIF’s over the last 12 months.

NE's Profit vs Risk Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as ESVIF (73). This means that NE’s stock grew similarly to ESVIF’s over the last 12 months.

NE's SMR Rating (65) in the null industry is in the same range as ESVIF (90). This means that NE’s stock grew similarly to ESVIF’s over the last 12 months.

NE's Price Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as ESVIF (60). This means that NE’s stock grew similarly to ESVIF’s over the last 12 months.

ESVIF's P/E Growth Rating (33) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NE (90). This means that ESVIF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NE’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ESVIFNE
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ESVIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PMVYX21.330.17
+0.80%
Putnam Sustainable Future Y
BVOIX12.240.09
+0.74%
Barrow Hanley US Value Opportunities I
GCMUX38.890.25
+0.65%
Goldman Sachs Mid Cap Value R6
RMFGX61.110.28
+0.46%
American Funds American Mutual R6
FEURX39.340.01
+0.03%
First Eagle Gold R6

ESVIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ESVIF has been loosely correlated with PDS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ESVIF jumps, then PDS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ESVIF
1D Price
Change %
ESVIF100%
-0.73%
PDS - ESVIF
52%
Loosely correlated
-1.59%
SDRL - ESVIF
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.49%
HP - ESVIF
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.48%
NE - ESVIF
43%
Loosely correlated
-1.29%
PTEN - ESVIF
42%
Loosely correlated
-2.95%
More