Advertisement
ESVIF vs NE
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ESVIF is a Hold and NE is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ESVIF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNE’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- ESVIF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- NE’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ESVIF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NE’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ESVIF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
- NE’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
ESVIF (@Contract Drilling) experienced а -1.29% price change this week, while NE (@Contract Drilling) price change was +0.59% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Contract Drilling industry was -3.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +31.22%.
Reported Earning Dates
NE is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Contract Drilling (-3.24% weekly)The contract drilling industry includes companies that provide onshore and offshore drilling services to the energy sector. Services are delivered on a contractual or per-fee basis. Customers of this industry include major and independent oil and gas companies. Strong oil demand could potentially boost contract fees. Helmerich & Payne, Inc., Transocean Ltd and Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. are among the major drilling companies in the U.S.
| ESVIF | NE | ESVIF / NE | |
| Capitalization | 330M | 4.76B | 7% |
| EBITDA | 389M | 1.11B | 35% |
| Gain YTD | -12.791 | 3.384 | -378% |
| P/E Ratio | 14.51 | 21.55 | 67% |
| Revenue | 1.67B | 3.45B | 48% |
| Total Cash | 15M | 478M | 3% |
| Total Debt | 998M | 1.98B | 50% |
ESVIF | NE | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 73 | 8 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 59 Fair valued | 16 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 63 | 45 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 89 | 82 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 46 | 44 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 25 | 7 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 48 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NE's Valuation (16) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ESVIF (59). This means that NE’s stock grew somewhat faster than ESVIF’s over the last 12 months.
NE's Profit vs Risk Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as ESVIF (63). This means that NE’s stock grew similarly to ESVIF’s over the last 12 months.
NE's SMR Rating (82) in the null industry is in the same range as ESVIF (89). This means that NE’s stock grew similarly to ESVIF’s over the last 12 months.
NE's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as ESVIF (46). This means that NE’s stock grew similarly to ESVIF’s over the last 12 months.
NE's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the null industry is in the same range as ESVIF (25). This means that NE’s stock grew similarly to ESVIF’s over the last 12 months.
| ESVIF | NE | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 76% | 6 days ago 68% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 72% | 15 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 87% |
Advertisement
ESVIF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ESVIF has been loosely correlated with PDS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ESVIF jumps, then PDS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ESVIF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESVIF | 100% | +1.04% | ||
| PDS - ESVIF | 52% Loosely correlated | +1.54% | ||
| SDRL - ESVIF | 45% Loosely correlated | +2.51% | ||
| HP - ESVIF | 44% Loosely correlated | -2.92% | ||
| NE - ESVIF | 43% Loosely correlated | +2.27% | ||
| PTEN - ESVIF | 42% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||