ESVIF
Price
$1.57
Change
-$0.01 (-0.63%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
289.02M
NTNOF
Price
$0.56
Change
-$0.10 (-15.15%)
Updated
Jun 3 closing price
Capitalization
187.22M
Interact to see
Advertisement

ESVIF vs NTNOF

Header iconESVIF vs NTNOF Comparison
Open Charts ESVIF vs NTNOFBanner chart's image
Ensign Energy Services
Price$1.57
Change-$0.01 (-0.63%)
Volume$29.3K
Capitalization289.02M
NORTHERN OCEAN
Price$0.56
Change-$0.10 (-15.15%)
Volume$2.5K
Capitalization187.22M
ESVIF vs NTNOF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ESVIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NTNOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ESVIF vs. NTNOF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ESVIF is a StrongBuy and NTNOF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (ESVIF: $1.57 vs. NTNOF: $0.56)
Brand notoriety: ESVIF and NTNOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Contract Drilling industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ESVIF: 122% vs. NTNOF: 100%
Market capitalization -- ESVIF: $289.02M vs. NTNOF: $187.22M
ESVIF [@Contract Drilling] is valued at $289.02M. NTNOF’s [@Contract Drilling] market capitalization is $187.22M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Contract Drilling] industry ranges from $4.54B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Contract Drilling] industry is $1.29B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ESVIF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNTNOF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ESVIF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NTNOF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ESVIF is a better buy in the long-term than NTNOF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ESVIF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NTNOF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ESVIF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NTNOF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both ESVIF and NTNOF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

ESVIF (@Contract Drilling) experienced а -2.13% price change this week, while NTNOF (@Contract Drilling) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Contract Drilling industry was -0.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.90%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Contract Drilling (-0.17% weekly)

The contract drilling industry includes companies that provide onshore and offshore drilling services to the energy sector. Services are delivered on a contractual or per-fee basis. Customers of this industry include major and independent oil and gas companies. Strong oil demand could potentially boost contract fees. Helmerich & Payne, Inc., Transocean Ltd and Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. are among the major drilling companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ESVIF($289M) has a higher market cap than NTNOF($187M). NTNOF YTD gains are higher at: -15.350 vs. ESVIF (-23.981). ESVIF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 389M vs. NTNOF (45.6M). NTNOF has more cash in the bank: 58M vs. ESVIF (15M). NTNOF has less debt than ESVIF: NTNOF (539M) vs ESVIF (998M). ESVIF has higher revenues than NTNOF: ESVIF (1.67B) vs NTNOF (237M).
ESVIFNTNOFESVIF / NTNOF
Capitalization289M187M155%
EBITDA389M45.6M853%
Gain YTD-23.981-15.350156%
P/E Ratio14.51N/A-
Revenue1.67B237M705%
Total Cash15M58M26%
Total Debt998M539M185%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ESVIF: Fundamental Ratings
ESVIF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
63
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
69
SMR RATING
1..100
92
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
61
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
31
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ESVIFNTNOF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
6%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
4%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
75%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
73%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ESVIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NTNOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TVRRX85.19N/A
N/A
Thornburg Small/Mid Cap Core R5
VESMX19.80N/A
N/A
VELA Small Cap I
TFFYX82.44N/A
N/A
Touchstone Focused Y
REEIX15.50N/A
N/A
RBC Emerging Markets Equity I
MGIFX12.24N/A
N/A
Mondrian Global Listed Infrastructure

ESVIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ESVIF has been loosely correlated with PDS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ESVIF jumps, then PDS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ESVIF
1D Price
Change %
ESVIF100%
-0.89%
PDS - ESVIF
52%
Loosely correlated
-2.59%
SDRL - ESVIF
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.06%
HP - ESVIF
44%
Loosely correlated
-2.93%
NE - ESVIF
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.76%
PTEN - ESVIF
42%
Loosely correlated
-2.74%
More

NTNOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NTNOF and ESVIF have been poorly correlated (+16% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NTNOF and ESVIF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NTNOF
1D Price
Change %
NTNOF100%
N/A
ESVIF - NTNOF
16%
Poorly correlated
-0.89%
AKTAF - NTNOF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SOC - NTNOF
7%
Poorly correlated
-0.78%
PHXHF - NTNOF
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.73%
NE - NTNOF
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.76%
More