ESVIF vs PDS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ESVIF is a Hold and PDS is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ESVIF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePDS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- ESVIF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- PDS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PDS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- PDS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
ESVIF (@Contract Drilling) experienced а +1.49% price change this week, while PDS (@Contract Drilling) price change was +2.52% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Contract Drilling industry was +1.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -13.34%, and the average quarterly price growth was -27.46%.
Reported Earning Dates
ESVIF is expected to report earnings on Mar 11, 2025.
PDS is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Contract Drilling (+1.42% weekly)The contract drilling industry includes companies that provide onshore and offshore drilling services to the energy sector. Services are delivered on a contractual or per-fee basis. Customers of this industry include major and independent oil and gas companies. Strong oil demand could potentially boost contract fees. Helmerich & Payne, Inc., Transocean Ltd and Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. are among the major drilling companies in the U.S.
| ESVIF | PDS | ESVIF / PDS | |
| Capitalization | 347M | 986M | 35% |
| EBITDA | 424M | 644M | 66% |
| Gain YTD | -33.981 | -29.278 | 116% |
| P/E Ratio | 94.34 | 4.69 | 2,014% |
| Revenue | 1.73B | 1.94B | 89% |
| Total Cash | 44.8M | 54.2M | 83% |
| Total Debt | 1.42B | 992M | 143% |
ESVIF | PDS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 4 | 16 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 52 Fair valued | 41 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 66 | 46 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 90 | 79 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 87 | 85 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 26 | 19 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PDS's Valuation (41) in the Contract Drilling industry is in the same range as ESVIF (52) in the null industry. This means that PDS’s stock grew similarly to ESVIF’s over the last 12 months.
PDS's Profit vs Risk Rating (46) in the Contract Drilling industry is in the same range as ESVIF (66) in the null industry. This means that PDS’s stock grew similarly to ESVIF’s over the last 12 months.
PDS's SMR Rating (79) in the Contract Drilling industry is in the same range as ESVIF (90) in the null industry. This means that PDS’s stock grew similarly to ESVIF’s over the last 12 months.
PDS's Price Growth Rating (85) in the Contract Drilling industry is in the same range as ESVIF (87) in the null industry. This means that PDS’s stock grew similarly to ESVIF’s over the last 12 months.
PDS's P/E Growth Rating (19) in the Contract Drilling industry is in the same range as ESVIF (26) in the null industry. This means that PDS’s stock grew similarly to ESVIF’s over the last 12 months.
| PDS | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 77% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 26 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% |
ESVIF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ESVIF has been loosely correlated with PDS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ESVIF jumps, then PDS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ESVIF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESVIF | 100% | -4.90% | ||
| PDS - ESVIF | 52% Loosely correlated | +0.44% | ||
| SDRL - ESVIF | 45% Loosely correlated | -2.47% | ||
| HP - ESVIF | 44% Loosely correlated | -0.75% | ||
| NE - ESVIF | 43% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| PTEN - ESVIF | 42% Loosely correlated | -1.31% | ||
More | ||||
PDS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PDS has been closely correlated with NE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PDS jumps, then NE could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PDS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PDS | 100% | +0.44% | ||
| NE - PDS | 80% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| NBR - PDS | 76% Closely correlated | -1.48% | ||
| PTEN - PDS | 76% Closely correlated | -1.31% | ||
| SDRL - PDS | 74% Closely correlated | -2.47% | ||
| HP - PDS | 72% Closely correlated | -0.75% | ||
More | ||||