ESVIF vs PHXHF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ESVIF is a Hold and PHXHF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ESVIF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePHXHF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
- ESVIF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- PHXHF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Price Growth
ESVIF (@Contract Drilling) experienced а +1.49% price change this week, while PHXHF (@Contract Drilling) price change was +2.76% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Contract Drilling industry was +1.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -13.43%, and the average quarterly price growth was -27.52%.
Reported Earning Dates
ESVIF is expected to report earnings on Mar 11, 2025.
PHXHF is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Contract Drilling (+1.30% weekly)The contract drilling industry includes companies that provide onshore and offshore drilling services to the energy sector. Services are delivered on a contractual or per-fee basis. Customers of this industry include major and independent oil and gas companies. Strong oil demand could potentially boost contract fees. Helmerich & Payne, Inc., Transocean Ltd and Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. are among the major drilling companies in the U.S.
| ESVIF | PHXHF | ESVIF / PHXHF | |
| Capitalization | 347M | 322M | 108% |
| EBITDA | 424M | 150M | 283% |
| Gain YTD | -33.981 | -13.704 | 248% |
| P/E Ratio | 94.34 | 4.70 | 2,007% |
| Revenue | 1.73B | 656M | 264% |
| Total Cash | 44.8M | 16.4M | 273% |
| Total Debt | 1.42B | 44.8M | 3,163% |
ESVIF | PHXHF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 4 | 59 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 52 Fair valued | 9 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 66 | 18 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 90 | 39 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 87 | 79 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 26 | 14 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PHXHF's Valuation (9) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ESVIF (52). This means that PHXHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ESVIF’s over the last 12 months.
PHXHF's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ESVIF (66). This means that PHXHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ESVIF’s over the last 12 months.
PHXHF's SMR Rating (39) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ESVIF (90). This means that PHXHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ESVIF’s over the last 12 months.
PHXHF's Price Growth Rating (79) in the null industry is in the same range as ESVIF (87). This means that PHXHF’s stock grew similarly to ESVIF’s over the last 12 months.
PHXHF's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the null industry is in the same range as ESVIF (26). This means that PHXHF’s stock grew similarly to ESVIF’s over the last 12 months.
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
ESVIF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ESVIF has been loosely correlated with PDS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ESVIF jumps, then PDS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ESVIF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESVIF | 100% | -4.90% | ||
| PDS - ESVIF | 52% Loosely correlated | +0.44% | ||
| SDRL - ESVIF | 45% Loosely correlated | -2.47% | ||
| HP - ESVIF | 44% Loosely correlated | -0.75% | ||
| NE - ESVIF | 43% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| PTEN - ESVIF | 42% Loosely correlated | -1.31% | ||
More | ||||
PHXHF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PHXHF has been loosely correlated with PDS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PHXHF jumps, then PDS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PHXHF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHXHF | 100% | -1.03% | ||
| PDS - PHXHF | 49% Loosely correlated | +0.44% | ||
| ESVIF - PHXHF | 40% Loosely correlated | -4.90% | ||
| RIG - PHXHF | 38% Loosely correlated | -0.86% | ||
| SDRL - PHXHF | 37% Loosely correlated | -2.47% | ||
| PTEN - PHXHF | 37% Loosely correlated | -1.31% | ||
More | ||||