Ad is loading...
ET
Price
$19.07
Change
+$0.10 (+0.53%)
Updated
Nov 22 closing price
81 days until earnings call
FANG
Price
$185.29
Change
+$2.59 (+1.42%)
Updated
Nov 22 closing price
94 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

ET vs FANG

Header iconET vs FANG Comparison
Open Charts ET vs FANGBanner chart's image
Energy Transfer
Price$19.07
Change+$0.10 (+0.53%)
Volume$22.17M
CapitalizationN/A
Diamondback Energy
Price$185.29
Change+$2.59 (+1.42%)
Volume$2.19M
CapitalizationN/A
ET vs FANG Comparison Chart
Loading...
ET
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
FANG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ET vs. FANG commentary
Nov 23, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ET is a Buy and FANG is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 23, 2024
Stock price -- (ET: $19.07 vs. FANG: $185.29)
Brand notoriety: ET and FANG are both notable
ET represents the Oil & Gas Pipelines, while FANG is part of the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ET: 149% vs. FANG: 68%
Market capitalization -- ET: $52.97B vs. FANG: $35.57B
ET [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] is valued at $52.97B. FANG’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $35.57B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry ranges from $76.58B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $151.38B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry is $10.44B. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $3.99B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ET’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFANG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ET’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FANG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both ET and FANG are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ET’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FANG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ET’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FANG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ET is a better buy in the short-term than FANG.

Price Growth

ET (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а +10.29% price change this week, while FANG (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was +4.92% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was +4.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.59%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was +3.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.53%.

Reported Earning Dates

ET is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2025.

FANG is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Pipelines (+4.88% weekly)

Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.

@Oil & Gas Production (+3.39% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ET($53B) has a higher market cap than FANG($35.6B). ET has higher P/E ratio than FANG: ET (14.39) vs FANG (11.50). ET YTD gains are higher at: 49.788 vs. FANG (24.801). ET has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 12.6B vs. FANG (6.17B). FANG has more cash in the bank: 582M vs. ET (161M). FANG has less debt than ET: FANG (6.8B) vs ET (53.2B). ET has higher revenues than FANG: ET (78.6B) vs FANG (8.34B).
ETFANGET / FANG
Capitalization53B35.6B149%
EBITDA12.6B6.17B204%
Gain YTD49.78824.801201%
P/E Ratio14.3911.50125%
Revenue78.6B8.34B943%
Total Cash161M582M28%
Total Debt53.2B6.8B782%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ET vs FANG: Fundamental Ratings
ET
FANG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2513
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
9
Undervalued
41
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1417
SMR RATING
1..100
5962
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3954
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5744
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ET's Valuation (9) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as FANG (41) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that ET’s stock grew similarly to FANG’s over the last 12 months.

ET's Profit vs Risk Rating (14) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as FANG (17) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that ET’s stock grew similarly to FANG’s over the last 12 months.

ET's SMR Rating (59) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as FANG (62) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that ET’s stock grew similarly to FANG’s over the last 12 months.

ET's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as FANG (54) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that ET’s stock grew similarly to FANG’s over the last 12 months.

FANG's P/E Growth Rating (44) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as ET (57) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry. This means that FANG’s stock grew similarly to ET’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ETFANG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 26 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
45%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
ET
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
FANG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
XBIT6.830.21
+3.17%
XBiotech
CHEK0.820.01
+1.48%
Check-Cap Ltd
RDNT82.040.74
+0.91%
RadNet
RYAAY42.980.10
+0.23%
Ryanair Holdings plc
IMTX7.590.01
+0.13%
Immatics NV

ET and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ET has been closely correlated with EPD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ET jumps, then EPD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ET
1D Price
Change %
ET100%
+0.53%
EPD - ET
74%
Closely correlated
+1.45%
PAA - ET
67%
Closely correlated
+0.67%
PAGP - ET
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.31%
MPLX - ET
61%
Loosely correlated
+2.55%
KMI - ET
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.18%
More