ET
Price
$16.68
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 8, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
57.22B
21 days until earnings call
FANG
Price
$149.07
Change
+$0.16 (+0.11%)
Updated
Oct 8, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
43.11B
26 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ET vs FANG

Header iconET vs FANG Comparison
Open Charts ET vs FANGBanner chart's image
Energy Transfer
Price$16.68
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$333.66K
Capitalization57.22B
Diamondback Energy
Price$149.07
Change+$0.16 (+0.11%)
Volume$10.08K
Capitalization43.11B
ET vs FANG Comparison Chart in %
ET
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FANG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ET vs. FANG commentary
Oct 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ET is a Buy and FANG is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 08, 2025
Stock price -- (ET: $16.67 vs. FANG: $148.91)
Brand notoriety: ET and FANG are both notable
ET represents the Oil & Gas Pipelines, while FANG is part of the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ET: 106% vs. FANG: 66%
Market capitalization -- ET: $57.22B vs. FANG: $43.11B
ET [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] is valued at $57.22B. FANG’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $43.11B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry ranges from $107.74B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $118.94B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry is $12.4B. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $3.73B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ET’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFANG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ET’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FANG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ET is a better buy in the long-term than FANG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ET’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FANG’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ET’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • FANG’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FANG is a better buy in the short-term than ET.

Price Growth

ET (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а -2.86% price change this week, while FANG (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was +4.06% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was +1.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.92%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was +2.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.34%.

Reported Earning Dates

ET is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

FANG is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Pipelines (+1.21% weekly)

Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.

@Oil & Gas Production (+2.57% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ET($57.2B) has a higher market cap than FANG($43.1B). ET has higher P/E ratio than FANG: ET (12.92) vs FANG (10.79). FANG YTD gains are higher at: -7.166 vs. ET (-10.182). ET has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 15.2B vs. FANG (9.71B). ET has more cash in the bank: 242M vs. FANG (219M). FANG has less debt than ET: FANG (15.1B) vs ET (61.6B). ET has higher revenues than FANG: ET (80.6B) vs FANG (14B).
ETFANGET / FANG
Capitalization57.2B43.1B133%
EBITDA15.2B9.71B157%
Gain YTD-10.182-7.166142%
P/E Ratio12.9210.79120%
Revenue80.6B14B576%
Total Cash242M219M111%
Total Debt61.6B15.1B408%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ET vs FANG: Fundamental Ratings
ET
FANG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
627
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
7
Undervalued
68
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1432
SMR RATING
1..100
6157
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6053
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5639
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5031

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ET's Valuation (7) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FANG (68) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that ET’s stock grew somewhat faster than FANG’s over the last 12 months.

ET's Profit vs Risk Rating (14) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as FANG (32) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that ET’s stock grew similarly to FANG’s over the last 12 months.

FANG's SMR Rating (57) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as ET (61) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry. This means that FANG’s stock grew similarly to ET’s over the last 12 months.

FANG's Price Growth Rating (53) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as ET (60) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry. This means that FANG’s stock grew similarly to ET’s over the last 12 months.

FANG's P/E Growth Rating (39) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as ET (56) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry. This means that FANG’s stock grew similarly to ET’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ETFANG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ET
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FANG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JBK26.130.36
+1.40%
Lehman ABS Corp
GDOC33.19-0.18
-0.54%
Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Eq ETF
ROUS57.42-0.32
-0.55%
Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF
FENI35.60-0.28
-0.78%
Fidelity Enhanced International ETF
IDGT86.30-1.07
-1.22%
iShares U.S. Digital Infras & RE ETF