ET
Price
$17.24
Change
-$0.14 (-0.81%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
59.18B
73 days until earnings call
GBNXF
Price
$18.63
Change
+$0.03 (+0.16%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
3.07B
Interact to see
Advertisement

ET vs GBNXF

Header iconET vs GBNXF Comparison
Open Charts ET vs GBNXFBanner chart's image
Energy Transfer
Price$17.24
Change-$0.14 (-0.81%)
Volume$10M
Capitalization59.18B
Gibson Energy
Price$18.63
Change+$0.03 (+0.16%)
Volume$200
Capitalization3.07B
ET vs GBNXF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ET
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GBNXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ET vs. GBNXF commentary
Aug 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ET is a Hold and GBNXF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 17, 2025
Stock price -- (ET: $17.24 vs. GBNXF: $18.63)
Brand notoriety: ET: Notable vs. GBNXF: Not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Pipelines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ET: 76% vs. GBNXF: 1%
Market capitalization -- ET: $59.18B vs. GBNXF: $3.07B
ET [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] is valued at $59.18B. GBNXF’s [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] market capitalization is $3.07B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry ranges from $103.07B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry is $12.01B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ET’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileGBNXF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ET’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • GBNXF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GBNXF is a better buy in the long-term than ET.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ET’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GBNXF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ET’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 8 bearish.
  • GBNXF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GBNXF is a better buy in the short-term than ET.

Price Growth

ET (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а -0.23% price change this week, while GBNXF (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was +0.92% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was -2.84%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.37%.

Reported Earning Dates

ET is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Pipelines (-2.84% weekly)

Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ET($59.2B) has a higher market cap than GBNXF($3.07B). GBNXF has higher P/E ratio than ET: GBNXF (26.42) vs ET (13.36). GBNXF YTD gains are higher at: 9.267 vs. ET (-7.111). ET has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 15.2B vs. GBNXF (536M). GBNXF has less debt than ET: GBNXF (2.76B) vs ET (60.6B). ET has higher revenues than GBNXF: ET (80.6B) vs GBNXF (10.8B).
ETGBNXFET / GBNXF
Capitalization59.2B3.07B1,931%
EBITDA15.2B536M2,836%
Gain YTD-7.1119.267-77%
P/E Ratio13.3626.4251%
Revenue80.6B10.8B746%
Total CashN/A41.6M-
Total Debt60.6B2.76B2,196%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ET vs GBNXF: Fundamental Ratings
ET
GBNXF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8150
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
25
Undervalued
57
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1278
SMR RATING
1..100
10050
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5747
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5224
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ET's Valuation (25) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as GBNXF (57) in the null industry. This means that ET’s stock grew similarly to GBNXF’s over the last 12 months.

ET's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is significantly better than the same rating for GBNXF (78) in the null industry. This means that ET’s stock grew significantly faster than GBNXF’s over the last 12 months.

GBNXF's SMR Rating (50) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ET (100) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry. This means that GBNXF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ET’s over the last 12 months.

GBNXF's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as ET (57) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry. This means that GBNXF’s stock grew similarly to ET’s over the last 12 months.

GBNXF's P/E Growth Rating (24) in the null industry is in the same range as ET (52) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry. This means that GBNXF’s stock grew similarly to ET’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ETGBNXF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
41%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
47%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 27 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
43%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ET
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GBNXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MARO18.400.11
+0.60%
Yieldmax Mara Option Income Strategy ETF
VGM9.680.01
+0.10%
Invesco Trust Investment Grade Municipals
UJUN36.22-0.03
-0.07%
Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra BffrETF™-Jun
MINN21.80-0.03
-0.14%
Mairs & Power Minnesota Municipal Bd ETF
EWY73.39-0.27
-0.37%
iShares MSCI South Korea ETF

ET and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ET has been closely correlated with TRGP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ET jumps, then TRGP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ET
1D Price
Change %
ET100%
-0.81%
TRGP - ET
73%
Closely correlated
-1.40%
PAGP - ET
73%
Closely correlated
-1.15%
PAA - ET
73%
Closely correlated
-1.02%
KNTK - ET
72%
Closely correlated
-0.24%
OKE - ET
72%
Closely correlated
-1.16%
More

GBNXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GBNXF has been loosely correlated with EPD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GBNXF jumps, then EPD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GBNXF
1D Price
Change %
GBNXF100%
+0.17%
EPD - GBNXF
44%
Loosely correlated
-1.32%
WMB - GBNXF
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.21%
OKE - GBNXF
42%
Loosely correlated
-1.16%
ET - GBNXF
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.81%
KMI - GBNXF
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.67%
More