Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ETAEX vs SCICX
ETAEX vs SCICX Comparison
Open Charts ETAEX vs SCICX
Eventide Exponential Technologies A
Price$14.30
Change-$0.27 (-1.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets93.63M
Columbia Seligman Tech & Info C
Price$59.83
Change-$1.18 (-1.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets18.21B
ETAEX vs SCICX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ETAEX vs. SCICX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ETAEX is a Hold and SCICX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCICX has more cash in the bank: 18.2B vs. ETAEX (93.6M). ETAEX (0.00) and SCICX (0.00) have matching dividends . ETAEX was incepted earlier than SCICX: ETAEX (5 years) vs SCICX (26 years). SCICX (1.93) is less costly to investors than ETAEX (1.74). ETAEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. SCICX (33.00). ETAEX has a lower initial minimum investment than SCICX: ETAEX (1000) vs SCICX (2000). ETAEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.75 vs. SCICX (6.42). ETAEX return over 5 years is better than : 9.30 vs. SCICX (7.47).
| ETAEX | SCICX | ETAEX / SCICX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 1.93 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 1.93 | 90% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.714 | 32.890 | 30% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2000 | 50% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 93.6M | 18.2B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.75 | 6.42 | 354% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.97 | 35.46 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.30 | 7.47 | 125% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 40.67 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement