Ad is loading...
ETAHX vs FSPHX
ETAHX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ETAHX vs. FSPHX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ETAHX is a Hold and FSPHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.42B vs. ETAHX (1.11B). FSPHX pays higher dividends than ETAHX: FSPHX (0.02) vs ETAHX (0.00). ETAHX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: ETAHX (12 years) vs FSPHX (44 years). ETAHX (1.57) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.65). ETAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. FSPHX (46.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than ETAHX: FSPHX (0) vs ETAHX (1000). FSPHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -9.61 vs. ETAHX (-18.09). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : 10.17 vs. ETAHX (0.66).
| ETAHX | FSPHX | ETAHX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 0.65 | 242% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 0.65 | 242% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.919 | -1.064 | 744% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.11B | 6.42B | 17% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.02 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -18.09 | -9.61 | 188% |
| Returns for 3 years | -8.52 | -10.12 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.66 | 10.17 | 6% |
| Returns for 10 years | 27.07 | 11.87 | 228% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers