Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ETAHX vs FSPHX
ETAHX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ETAHX vs. FSPHX commentary
Oct 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ETAHX is a StrongBuy and FSPHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.96B vs. ETAHX (1.37B). FSPHX pays higher dividends than ETAHX: FSPHX (0.02) vs ETAHX (0.00). ETAHX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: ETAHX (13 years) vs FSPHX (44 years). ETAHX (1.57) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). ETAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than ETAHX: FSPHX (0) vs ETAHX (1000). ETAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.20 vs. FSPHX (-10.39). ETAHX (-13.72) and FSPHX (-13.76) have equivalent 5 years return.
| ETAHX | FSPHX | ETAHX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 0.63 | 249% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 0.63 | 249% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 26.335 | 3.376 | 780% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.37B | 5.96B | 23% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.02 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.20 | -10.39 | -166% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.10 | 7.09 | 509% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.72 | -13.76 | 100% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.83 | 36.17 | 259% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement