Ad is loading...
ETAHX vs FSPHX
ETAHX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ETAHX vs. FSPHX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ETAHX is a Hold and FSPHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 7.05B vs. ETAHX (1.32B). ETAHX (0.00) and FSPHX (0.00) have matching dividends . ETAHX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: ETAHX (12 years) vs FSPHX (44 years). ETAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 79.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than ETAHX: FSPHX (0) vs ETAHX (1000). ETAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.94 vs. FSPHX (-8.97). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -5.20 vs. ETAHX (-12.56).
| ETAHX | FSPHX | ETAHX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.304 | 2.606 | 242% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.32B | 7.05B | 19% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.94 | -8.97 | 55% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.15 | 2.51 | 325% |
| Returns for 5 years | -12.56 | -5.20 | 242% |
| Returns for 10 years | 53.37 | 19.51 | 274% |