Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ETCDX vs FSMDX
ETCDX vs FSMDX Comparison
Open Charts ETCDX vs FSMDX
Eventide Dividend Growth C
Price$19.29
Change+$0.05 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.21B
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$36.08
Change+$0.17 (+0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.38B
ETCDX vs FSMDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ETCDX vs. FSMDX commentary
Jul 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ETCDX is a Buy and FSMDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 42.4B vs. ETCDX (1.21B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than ETCDX: FSMDX (1.31) vs ETCDX (0.00). ETCDX was incepted earlier than FSMDX: ETCDX (8 years) vs FSMDX (14 years). ETCDX (1.96) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). ETCDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.00 vs. FSMDX (8.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than ETCDX: FSMDX (0) vs ETCDX (1000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.57 vs. ETCDX (8.46). FSMDX (77.78) and ETCDX (76.41) have equivalent 5 years return.
| ETCDX | FSMDX | ETCDX / FSMDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 0.03 | 7,800% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 0.03 | 7,840% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.452 | 6.595 | 68% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.21B | 42.4B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.31 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.46 | 15.57 | 54% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.42 | 47.86 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 76.41 | 77.78 | 98% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 120.51 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement