Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ETCDX vs FSMDX
ETCDX vs FSMDX Comparison
Open Charts ETCDX vs FSMDX
Eventide Dividend Growth C
Price$19.14
Change+$0.04 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.21B
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$35.65
Change-$0.10 (-0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.39B
ETCDX vs FSMDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ETCDX vs. FSMDX commentary
Aug 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ETCDX is a Hold and FSMDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 43.4B vs. ETCDX (1.21B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than ETCDX: FSMDX (1.29) vs ETCDX (0.00). ETCDX was incepted earlier than FSMDX: ETCDX (8 years) vs FSMDX (14 years). ETCDX (1.96) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). ETCDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than ETCDX: FSMDX (0) vs ETCDX (1000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.75 vs. ETCDX (7.77). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 64.86 vs. ETCDX (60.76).
| ETCDX | FSMDX | ETCDX / FSMDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 0.03 | 7,800% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 0.03 | 7,840% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.909 | 5.823 | 67% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.21B | 43.4B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.29 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.77 | 13.75 | 56% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.57 | 35.39 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.76 | 64.86 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 121.13 | - |