Ad is loading...
ETCMY
Price
$1.03
Change
-$0.08 (-7.21%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
FKWL
Price
$4.27
Change
-$0.10 (-2.29%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
2 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

ETCMY vs FKWL

Header iconETCMY vs FKWL Comparison
Open Charts ETCMY vs FKWLBanner chart's image
Eutelsat Communications
Price$1.03
Change-$0.08 (-7.21%)
Volume$1.1K
CapitalizationN/A
Franklin Wireless
Price$4.27
Change-$0.10 (-2.29%)
Volume$74.95K
CapitalizationN/A
ETCMY vs FKWL Comparison Chart
Loading...
FKWL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ETCMY vs. FKWL commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ETCMY is a Hold and FKWL is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (ETCMY: $1.03 vs. FKWL: $4.27)
Brand notoriety: ETCMY and FKWL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Telecommunications Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ETCMY: 27% vs. FKWL: 641%
Market capitalization -- ETCMY: $1.68B vs. FKWL: $35.23M
ETCMY [@Telecommunications Equipment] is valued at $1.68B. FKWL’s [@Telecommunications Equipment] market capitalization is $35.23M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Telecommunications Equipment] industry ranges from $202.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Telecommunications Equipment] industry is $4.92B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ETCMY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFKWL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ETCMY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FKWL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FKWL is a better buy in the long-term than ETCMY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FKWL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • FKWL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

ETCMY (@Telecommunications Equipment) experienced а -7.21% price change this week, while FKWL (@Telecommunications Equipment) price change was +0.47% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Telecommunications Equipment industry was -2.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.96%.

Reported Earning Dates

FKWL is expected to report earnings on Nov 20, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Telecommunications Equipment (-2.24% weekly)

The Telecommunications Equipment industry produces voice and data communications equipment, which includes fiber optic delivery products, digital signal processors, high-speed voice, data and video delivery. Additionally, satellite systems, global positioning systems, wireless data systems, personal communications equipment, telephone handsets and payload equipment for satellites also fall into this category. Apple Inc., QUALCOMM Incorporated and Nokia are major global players in this segment.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ETCMY($1.68B) has a higher market cap than FKWL($35.2M). FKWL has higher P/E ratio than ETCMY: FKWL (24.15) vs ETCMY (12.41). FKWL YTD gains are higher at: 25.959 vs. ETCMY (-8.036). ETCMY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 757M vs. FKWL (-1.17M). ETCMY has more cash in the bank: 380M vs. FKWL (32.7M). FKWL has less debt than ETCMY: FKWL (0) vs ETCMY (3.28B). ETCMY has higher revenues than FKWL: ETCMY (1.15B) vs FKWL (47.4M).
ETCMYFKWLETCMY / FKWL
Capitalization1.68B35.2M4,770%
EBITDA757M-1.17M-64,802%
Gain YTD-8.03625.959-31%
P/E Ratio12.4124.1551%
Revenue1.15B47.4M2,432%
Total Cash380M32.7M1,162%
Total Debt3.28B0-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ETCMY vs FKWL: Fundamental Ratings
ETCMY
FKWL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5029
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
1
Undervalued
54
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10088
SMR RATING
1..100
9290
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7443
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
524
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a45

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ETCMY's Valuation (1) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FKWL (54). This means that ETCMY’s stock grew somewhat faster than FKWL’s over the last 12 months.

FKWL's Profit vs Risk Rating (88) in the null industry is in the same range as ETCMY (100). This means that FKWL’s stock grew similarly to ETCMY’s over the last 12 months.

FKWL's SMR Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as ETCMY (92). This means that FKWL’s stock grew similarly to ETCMY’s over the last 12 months.

FKWL's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as ETCMY (74). This means that FKWL’s stock grew similarly to ETCMY’s over the last 12 months.

FKWL's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ETCMY (52). This means that FKWL’s stock grew somewhat faster than ETCMY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FKWL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FKWL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DGEZX12.39-0.04
-0.32%
Destinations Equity Income Z
PMVFX25.79-0.18
-0.69%
PGIM Quant Solutions Mid-Cap Val R4
FTASX28.49-0.26
-0.90%
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 70% M
UPUPX9.23-0.18
-1.91%
Upright Growth
JIGAX86.42-1.77
-2.01%
JPMorgan U.S. GARP Equity A

ETCMY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ETCMY and EUTLF have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ETCMY and EUTLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ETCMY
1D Price
Change %
ETCMY100%
-7.21%
EUTLF - ETCMY
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ELST - ETCMY
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KPIFF - ETCMY
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ERIXF - ETCMY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FKWL - ETCMY
-2%
Poorly correlated
-2.35%
More

FKWL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FKWL and CSCO have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FKWL and CSCO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FKWL
1D Price
Change %
FKWL100%
-2.35%
CSCO - FKWL
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.79%
VISL - FKWL
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.25%
VSAT - FKWL
22%
Poorly correlated
-4.27%
BOXL - FKWL
21%
Poorly correlated
-17.97%
ITRN - FKWL
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.41%
More