Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ETMOX vs HULFX
ETMOX vs HULFX Comparison
Open Charts ETMOX vs HULFX
Eaton Vance MO Municipal Income A
Price$8.70
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets92.24M
Hawaiian Tax-Free Trust F
Price$10.63
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets380.45M
ETMOX vs HULFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ETMOX vs. HULFX commentary
Nov 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ETMOX is a Hold and HULFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HULFX has more cash in the bank: 380M vs. ETMOX (92.2M). ETMOX pays higher dividends than HULFX: ETMOX (3.40) vs HULFX (2.61). ETMOX was incepted earlier than HULFX: ETMOX (32 years) vs HULFX (7 years). HULFX (0.76) is less costly to investors than ETMOX (0.71). ETMOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.00 vs. HULFX (18.00). HULFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ETMOX: HULFX (0) vs ETMOX (1000). HULFX (3.09) and ETMOX (3.00) have marching annual gain over last year. HULFX return over 5 years is better than : 1.70 vs. ETMOX (-0.34).
| ETMOX | HULFX | ETMOX / HULFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.76 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.76 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.712 | 3.607 | 103% |
| Front Load | 3% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 92.2M | 380M | 24% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.40 | 2.61 | 130% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.00 | 3.09 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.18 | 9.06 | 123% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.34 | 1.70 | -20% |
| Returns for 10 years | 5.01 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement