Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ETMOX vs HULFX
ETMOX vs HULFX Comparison
Open Charts ETMOX vs HULFX
Eaton Vance MO Municipal Income A
Price$8.67
Change+$0.01 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets90.32M
Hawaiian Tax-Free Trust F
Price$10.61
Change+$0.01 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets383.93M
ETMOX vs HULFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ETMOX vs. HULFX commentary
Oct 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ETMOX is a Hold and HULFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HULFX has more cash in the bank: 384M vs. ETMOX (90.3M). ETMOX pays higher dividends than HULFX: ETMOX (3.16) vs HULFX (2.57). ETMOX was incepted earlier than HULFX: ETMOX (32 years) vs HULFX (7 years). HULFX (0.76) is less costly to investors than ETMOX (0.71). ETMOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. HULFX (18.00). HULFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ETMOX: HULFX (0) vs ETMOX (1000). ETMOX (2.54) and HULFX (2.54) have marching annual gain over last year. HULFX return over 5 years is better than : 1.76 vs. ETMOX (0.16).
| ETMOX | HULFX | ETMOX / HULFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.76 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.76 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.954 | 3.041 | 97% |
| Front Load | 3% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 90.3M | 384M | 24% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.16 | 2.57 | 123% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.54 | 2.54 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.33 | 10.33 | 119% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.16 | 1.76 | 9% |
| Returns for 10 years | 4.46 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement